Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2025; 17(5): 105872
Published online May 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.105872
Published online May 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.105872
Table 5 Comparison of net reclassification index and integrated discrimination improvement between the Target Immunotherapy Predictive Model and other classical models
Model | Internal training cohort, NRI | Internal training cohort, IDI | Internal validation cohort, NRI | Internal validation cohort, IDI | External validation cohort, NRI | External validation cohort, IDI |
TIPM vs TNM | 0.175 | 0.374 | 0.258 | 0.481 | 0.418 | 0.435 |
TIPM vs BCLC | 0.330 | 0.497 | 0.238 | 0.330 | 0.605 | 0.492 |
TIPM vs CNLC | 0.387 | 0.423 | 0.440 | 0.587 | 0.534 | 0.355 |
TIPM vs HKLC | 0.278 | 0.385 | 0.602 | 0.558 | 0.754 | 0.454 |
TIPM vs CRAFITY | 0.225 | 0.340 | 0.329 | 0.451 | 0.484 | 0.401 |
- Citation: Tu HB, Feng SY, Chen LH, Huang YJ, Zhang JZ, Peng SY, Lin DL, Ye XJ. Integrating ultrasound and serum indicators for evaluating outcomes of targeted immunotherapy in advanced liver cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(5): 105872
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i5/105872.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.105872