Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2025; 17(5): 103809
Published online May 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.103809
Published online May 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.103809
Table 4 Analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves
Evaluation factors | AUC | 95%CI | Threshold | True positive rate | Selectivity | Yoden |
T installment | ||||||
CA19-9 | 0.812 | 0.736-0.888 | 37.253 | 78.523 | 73.465 | 0.520 |
CA125 | 0.798 | 0.723-0.873 | 32.864 | 76.352 | 71.923 | 0.483 |
DCE-MRI indicators and cancer markers | 0.923 | 0.865-0.981 | 0.526 | 89.734 | 85.623 | 0.754 |
Degree of differentiation | ||||||
CA19-9 | 0.803 | 0.728-0.878 | 35.921 | 77.462 | 72.845 | 0.503 |
CA125 | 0.785 | 0.711-0.859 | 31.532 | 75.283 | 70.942 | 0.462 |
DCE-MRI parameters + tumor markers | 0.912 | 0.855-0.969 | 0.512 | 88.653 | 84.372 | 0.730 |
- Citation: Wang Q, Zhang XY, Yang JF, Tao YL. Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging parameters and serum markers in preoperative rectal cancer evaluation: Combined diagnostic value. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(5): 103809
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i5/103809.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.103809