Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2025; 17(5): 103809
Published online May 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.103809
Published online May 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.103809
Table 3 Analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves
Evaluation factors | AUC | 95%CI | Threshold value | True positive rate | Selectivity | Yoden |
T installment | ||||||
Ktrans | 0.835 | 0.762-0.908 | 0.286 | 79.825 | 75.632 | 0.555 |
Ve | 0.812 | 0.736-0.888 | 0.375 | 77.234 | 73.521 | 0.508 |
DCE-MRI parameters | 0.892 | 0.832-0.952 | 0.462 | 85.763 | 81.924 | 0.677 |
Degree of differentiation | ||||||
Ktrans | 0.821 | 0.748-0.894 | 0.273 | 78.632 | 74.825 | 0.535 |
Ve | 0.803 | 0.728-0.878 | 0.362 | 76.523 | 72.934 | 0.495 |
DCE-MRI parameters | 0.883 | 0.821-0.945 | 0.453 | 84.925 | 80.763 | 0.657 |
- Citation: Wang Q, Zhang XY, Yang JF, Tao YL. Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging parameters and serum markers in preoperative rectal cancer evaluation: Combined diagnostic value. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(5): 103809
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i5/103809.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.103809