Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jan 15, 2023; 15(1): 1-18
Published online Jan 15, 2023. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i1.1
Table 2 Clinical studies of systemic therapy combined with local regional therapy in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma
Ref.
Interventions
Study type
Disease
Outcome
Wang et al[160]Anti-PD-1 + RFA (n = 40) vs RFA (n = 40)RetrospectiveRecurrent HCC after resectionRFS 39.1 wk vs 19.3 wk, P = 0.002
Gu et al[161]Apatinib + TACE (n = 40) vs TACE (n = 40)ProspectiveIntrahepatic recurrence after resectionRFS 17.2 mo vs 12.5 mo, P = 0.041
Peng et al[162]Sorafenib + TACE (n = 128) vs TACE (132)RetrospectiveIntermediate-stage recurrent HCC5-yr OS: 38.9% vs 20.5%, P = 0.01; 5-yr PFS, 37.5% vs 18.7%, P = 0.003
Wan et al[163]Sorafenib + TACE (n = 127) vs TACE (n = 127)RetrospectiveUnresectable recurrent HCCOS 30.7 mo vs 18.2 mo, P = 0.003
Zhou et al[164]Sorafenib + RFA (n = 174) vs RFA (n = 174)Retrospective (multicenter)Recurrent HCC after curative resection1-, 3-, 5-yr OS: 97.7%, 83.7%, 54.7% vs 93.1%, 61.3%, 30.9%, P < 0.001
Guo et al[165]Camrelizumab + TACE (n = 20) vs TACE (n = 59)RetrospectiveRecurrent HCC after curative resectionORR 40.0% vs 56.9% NS; PFS 6 mo vs 9 mo NS
Iwata et al[166]Sorafenib + HAICCaseRecurrent HCC after resectionOS 24 mo
Chen et al[167]Toripalimab + TKI + Radiation (n = 17)ProspectiveAdvanced recurrent HCC1-, 2-yr OS: 60%, 24%
Wei et al[168] Sorafenib + RFA (n = 103) vs RFA (n = 108)Retrospective (multicenter)Early-stage recurrent HCC with MVIRFS: 17.7 mo vs 13.1 mo, P < 0.001; OS: 32.0 mo vs 25.0 mo, P = 0.002
Feng et al[169]Sorafenib + RFA (n = 48) vs RFA (n = 40)Retrospective (multicenter)BCLC Stage 0-B1 recurrent HCC1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-yr OS: 85.6%, 64.0%, 58.7%, 50.3% vs 80.7%, 47.2%, 30.9%, 30.9%, P = 0.036
Mahn et al[170]Resection, RFA; Sorafenib, CabozantinibCaseRecurrent HCC after LTOS longer than 10 yr