Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Hepatol. Feb 28, 2017; 9(6): 310-317
Published online Feb 28, 2017. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i6.310
Table 1 Demographic, laboratory and histological features of patients with chronic hepatitis C of both populations
VariablesAll (n = 760)Rio population (n = 222)Angers population (n = 538)
Females, n (%)401 (54)134 (60)179 (35)
Age (yr, mean ± SD)46 ± 1151 ± 1146 ± 11
AST, IU/L (mean ± SD)67 ± 5868 ± 5266 ± 60
ALT, IU/L (mean ± SD)101 ± 84100 ± 67101 ± 90
Platelet count, 106/mm3 (mean ± SD)208 ± 68203 ± 63210 ± 70
GGT, IU/L (mean ± SD)144 ± 171124 ± 135110 ± 184
APRI1.0 ± 1.20.9 ± 1.21.1 ± 1.3
Forns6.0 ± 1.9
FibroMeterVirus3G0.6 ± 0.30.6 ± 0.30.6 ± 0.3
Biopsy length (mm, mean ± SD)22 ± 924 ± 522 ± 10
METAVIR stage, n (%)
F022 (3)5 (2)17 (3)
F1283 (37)91 (41)192 (36)
F2215 (28)55 (25)160 (30)
F3145 (19)54 (24)91 (17)
F495 (13)17 (8)78 (14)
Table 2 Rates of correct FibroMeterVirus3G stage classification in comparison to liver biopsy in the Rio population
FibroMeter stageMETAVIR fibrosis classification
Correct fibrosis class classification according to liver biopsy (%)
01234n
F0/F10100001010/10 = 100
F10610076/7 = 86
F1[F1-F2]3214203025/30 = 83
F2[F1-F2]12610414236/42 = 86
F2[F1-F3]115121003837/38 = 97
F2/F309171234129/41 = 71
F3[F2-F4]0482264036/40 = 90
F4[F3-F4]003471411/14 = 79
Total591555417222190/222 = 86
Table 3 Performance of aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index, Forns, FibroMeterVirus3G and combination algorithm to discriminate significant fibrosis (F0-F1 vs F2-F4) in derivation and validation population
Serum fibrosis testsAUROC (95%CI)Cut-off valueSe (%)Sp (%)PPV (%)NPV (%)OA (%)
Derivation population (n = 222)
FM score0.855 (0.801-0.898)0.617981857480
APRI0.815 (0.757-0.864)0.518753717672
1.523598965362
Forns0.769 (0.708-0.823)4.239431647966
6.944187815361
Apri + FM7682857279
Forns + FM8175817578
Validation population (n = 538)
FM score0.854 (0.821-0.888)0.616787896375
Apri + FM5788875769