Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Stem Cells. Jun 26, 2025; 17(6): 107833
Published online Jun 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i6.107833
Table 3 Combination of mesenchymal stem cells and nerve guidance conduits for the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries
Cell source
Conduits
Models
Cell numbers
Outcome
Notes
Ref.
AT-MSCs (human)Polycaprolactone15 mm gap in the rat sciatic nerve1 × 106Improvement in axonal growth and expression of factors that aid in reinnervating muscle tissuePoloxamer hydrogel + AT-MSCs promote more axonal growth than when AT-MSCs were delivered without it[97]
AT-MSCs (rat)Fibrin gelA 20 mm segment of the sciatic nerve was excised in rats and sutured back in the reverse direction3 × 106Enhanced remyelination, axonal regeneration, and functional recoveryThe use of AT-MSCs resulted in a significant improvement compared with the autologous nerve graft group[98]
AT-MSCs (rat)Silicone tube10 mm gap in the rat sciatic nerve1 × 106Improvement in the recovery of walking functionThe combination of AT-MSCs with platelet-rich fibrin showed better results than AT-MSCs alone[99]
AT-MSCs (canine)Polycaprolactone + heterologous fibrin biopolymer12 mm gap in the rat sciatic nerve1 × 106Improvement in functional motors and electrophysiological recoveryThe improvements observed were not significantly different from those obtained with autografts[100]
AT-MSCs (rat)Chitosan + acellular nerve10 mm gap in the rat sciatic nerveUnknownImprovement in neurological and motor function and in the quality of the myelin sheathAt 12 weeks there was no significant difference in the degree of recovery compared with the autograft group. The electrophysiological characteristics were also similar to those of the autograft[101]
BM-MSCs (rat)Polycaprolactone + fibrin sealant6-7 mm gap in the rat sciatic nerve3 × 105Improvement in the regeneration process, modulation of SCs, and motor functional recoveryThere was no significant difference in the total estimated number of regenerated fibers between the groups[102]
BM-MSCs (rat)Bio 3D conduits from BM-MSCs5 mm gap in the rat sciatic nerve3 × 105Improvements in nerve regeneration, kinematic analysis, and morphological parametersNo neuroma formation was found 8 weeks after the surgery. The Bio 3D group exhibited a higher abundance of myelinated axons compared with both the silicone NGC group and the silicone NGC with MSCs group[96]
UC-MSCs (human)Longitudinally oriented collagen conduitA 35-mm-long segment of the dog’s sciatic nerve was removed1 × 106Improvements in axonal regeneration and functional recoveryNerve regeneration was inferior to the autologous nerve graft group[103]
UC-MSCs (human)Bio 3D conduits from UC-MSCs5 mm gap in the rat sciatic nerve3 × 105Improvements in kinematic analysis, as well as in the diameters and number of myelinated axonsThe Bio 3D conduit showed better results than the silicone tube and demonstrated nerve regeneration comparable with the autologous group. UC-MSCs in the Bio 3D conduit gradually diminished until week 8[95]
WJ-MSCs (human)Acellular nerve10 mm gap in the rat sciatic nerve1 × 106Improvements in myelin and axon regeneration, nerve function, and muscle atrophy reductionEvaluation at 8 weeks. Increased in both the proportion of myelin in the tissue and myelin thickness, resembling the results seen in the autograft group[104]
WJ-MSCs (human)Poly (DL-lactide-e-caprolactone) copolyester10 mm gap in the rat sciatic nerve2 × 106Improvements in nerve regeneration, functional recovery, and increased expression of neurotrophic and angiogenic factorsEvaluation at 12 weeks[105]
OM-MSCs (rat)ChitosanAbout 10 mm gap in the rat sciatic nerve1 × 106Improved in nerve regeneration, motor performance, sciatic indexes, and lower gait dysfunctionThe treated groups did not show a significant difference in the stereological results[106]
GMSCs (human)Bio 3D conduits from GMSCsA 5 mm gap in the buccal branch of the rat facial nerve4 × 104Improvements in nerve regeneration and functional recoveryEffects comparable to the autograft group[94]