Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2016; 22(33): 7613-7624
Published online Sep 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i33.7613
Table 1 Experimental associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy models
Ref.YearSpeciesPVLPHx in stage IPHx in stage IILoss of liver massAtrophy of ligated lobe on day 7Future remnant liver lobeFold increase on day 7Proliferation
Schlegel et al[42]2014MouseRMLLLL (30%)Ligated lobes85% totally (55% PVL + 30% PHx)NALML (15%)4-foldPeaked on day 4
RL
CL
Yao et al[70]2014RatLLLNANA80% PVLNARML (20%)2.5-foldPeaked on day 2
LML
RL
CL
Almau Trenard et al[71]2014RatLLLNANA80% PVLReduction to 35.2%RML (20%)2-foldNA
LML
RL
CL
Dhar et al[54]2015RatLLLNANA80% PVLNARML (20%)2-foldPeaked on day 2
LML
RL
CL
Wei et al[58]2015RatLLLCL (10%)Ligated lobes80% totally (70% PVL + 10% PHx)Reduction to 48.2%RML (20%)2.53-foldPeaked on day 1
LML
RL
García-Pérez et al[59]2015RatRSLRML (20%)Ligated lobes80% totally (60% PVL + 20% PHx)N/ALML (22%)2-foldPeaked on day 2
RIL
LLL
RML
Shi et al[60]2015RatRMLLLL (30%)Ligated lobes80% totally (50% PVL + 30% PHx)Reduction to 34.9%LML (20%)2.3 foldPeaked on day 2
RL
CL
Table 2 Comparison of the effect of different techniques on liver regeneration
InterventionCytokine releaseGrowth factor expressionDNA synthesisPortal vein flow decreaseHepatocyte hypertrophy inductionIncreased NPC activityAtrophy of the affected lobeRef.
PVL++++++++++++++[42,54,58-60,70,71]
PVE++++++++[42,54, 58-60,70,71]
Parenchymal Transection+++++0+++[42,47-49,54,58-61,64,70-72]
ALPPS+++++++++++++++++++[42,47-49,54,58-61,64,70-72]