Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2015; 21(48): 13418-13431
Published online Dec 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13418
Table 1 Concomitant cholangiocarcinoma in hepatic resection for hepatolithiasis n (%)
Ref.YearNation/regionCase (n)Incidence
Zhu et al[34]2014China2056107 (5.2)
Lin et al[32]2013Taiwan21110 (4.7)
Tabrizian et al[35]2012Italy307 (23.3)
Cheon et al[30]2009South Korea908 (9.0)
Uenishi et al[12]2009Japan8610 (11.6)
Lee et al[36]2007Taiwan1234 (3.3)
Catena et al[37]2006Italy172 (11.7)
Chen et al[38]2004Hong Kong10310 (9.7)
Table 2 Subsequent cholangiocarcinoma after initial management for hepatolithiasis
Ref.YearNation/regionCases (n)Incidence of cholangiocarcinoma
TotalStone removal
CompleteResidual
Kim et al[33]2015South Korea2366.8%3.3%10.4%
Tsuyuguchi et al[39]2014Japan1219.9%9.1%10.4%
Lin et al[32]2013Taiwan1976.1%4.9%11.8%
Park et al[6]2013South Korea852.4%
Cheon et al[30]2009South Korea2254.9%4.0%8.0%
Uenishi et al[12]2009Japan762.6%
Lee et al[36]2007Taiwan1231.6%
Chen et al[38]2004Hong Kong913.3%
Huang et al[42]2003Taiwan2092.4%0.7%6.6%
Table 3 Clinical characteristics of subsequent cholangiocarcinoma patients[33]
CaseSex/ageLocation of stoneTreatment methodResidual stoneTime of CC (mo)Location of CCStage
1M/65LtERCPYes14LtIVA
2M/69LtPTCSLYes15LtIII
3M/72LtPTCSLYes17LtIVA
4M/66LtERCPYes21LtIII
5M/51LtPTCSLYes13LtIVA
6M/63LtPTCSLNo53LtIVA
7F/71RtERCPYes79BothIII
8F/54BothPTCSLYes10LtIVA
9F/56RtPTCSLNo111RtIVA
10F/65BothPTCSLYes72LtIVA
11M/60BothLt. hemi-hepatectomyYes102RtIII
12F/67BothLt. lobectomyYes55RtIVA
13F/51LtLt. hemi- hepatectomyNo109LtII
14M/52BothLt. lobectomyYes28RtIVA
151F/47LtLt. hemi-hepatectomyNo14CaudateIII
16F/56BothLt. lobectomyYes81RtIVB