Brief Article
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2014; 20(17): 4972-4979
Published online May 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.4972
Table 1 Demographics and baseline characteristics of sample population n (%)
CharacteristicsValue
Age (yr)
50-59122 (28.6)
60-69159 (37.2)
70-79146 (34.2)
Sex
Female225 (51.8)
Male209 (48.6)
Race/ethnicity
White424 (98.4)
Non-white7 (1.6)
Education
Some high school11 (2.6)
High school graduate or GED108 (25.2)
Vocational, technical or business school40 (9.3)
Some college or associate’s degree98 (22.9)
4-yr college graduate or Bachelor’s degree76 (18.8)
Graduate or professional school95 (22.2)
Region
Minnesota251 (57.8)
Other183 (42.2)
Positive personal history of cancer
Aero-digestive cancer138 (8.8)
Other2152 (35.0)
No244 (56.2)
Positive familial history of cancer
Yes278 (66.8)
No125 (30.0)
Not sure13 (3.1)
CRC screening history
Yes355 (84.9)
No50 (12.0)
Not sure13 (3.1)
Personal concern with cancer3
Yes311 (73.5)
No112 (26.5)
Table 2 Likelihood of using multi-organ stool-DNA test
Characteristic (n)Very likelyLikelyUnlikelyVery unlikelyNot sureP value1
Age (yr)
50-59 (121)69.4%25.6%3.3%1.7%0.0%0.56
60-69 (157)82.2%15.3%1.3%0.0%1.2%
70-79 (145)75.2%20.7%2.1%0.0%2.0%
Sex
Female (219)76.2%20.1%1.8%0.5%1.4%0.89
Male (204)76.0%20.0%2.5%0.5%1.0%
Prior CRC screening
Yes (352)75.6%20.5%2.6%0.6%0.9%0.66
No (49)75.5%20.4%0.0%0.0%4.1%
Do not know (13)76.9%23.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Personal concern with cancer
Yes (311)79.1%16.7%2.6%0.3%1.3%0.48
No (112)67.9%29.4%0.9%0.9%0.9%
Respondents2
Early (303)76.6%19.1%3.0%0.0%1.3%0.38
Late (120)75.0%22.5%0.0%1.7%0.8%
Table 3 Respondents’ rating of test features in multi-organ stool-DNA test and routine screening tool
Very importantSomewhat importantNot at all importantNot sure
Stool-DNA test
Detects multiple cancers with single test95.1%4.20.00.7
Safe noninvasive test85.0%13.30.71.0
No need for bowel preparation80.8%15.73.00.5
No need for sedation77.8%18.73.00.5
No need to change diet or medications75.4%22.01.90.7
Performed in the privacy of home73.8%21.54.20.5
No need to take time off from work56.8%15.227.30.7
A routine screening tool
Ability of test to detect pre-cancer or change in body before it becomes cancer96.5%3.00.20.2
Accuracy of the test to say there is a cancer when there really is a cancer94.7%4.60.00.7
Accuracy of the test to say there really is no cancer when there is no cancer93.3%5.30.50.9
Whether test is covered by insurance62.2%27.78.51.6
Risk of injury with test55.6%31.410.22.8
How often the test has to be done34.9%43.119.22.8
The cost of the test34.0%44.417.83.8
Use of laxatives and/or enemas for bowel preparation27.8%46.522.92.8
Discomfort associated with the test24.9%48.224.22.6
Table 4 Demographics of early versus late respondents
CharacteristicsEarly respondentsLate respondentsP value1
Sex0.040
Female55.0%44.0%
Male45.0%56.0%
Race/ethnicity0.400
White98.7%97.6%
Non-white1.3%2.4%
Education0.340
Some high school2.9%1.6%
High school graduate or GED25.2%25.4%
Vocational, technical or business school10.8%5.7%
Some college or associate’s degree23.5%21.3%
4-year college graduate or Bachelor’s degree17.7%18.0%
Graduate or professional school19.9%27.9%
Region0.001
Minnesota62.8%45.6%
Other37.2%54.4%