Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2014; 20(17): 4839-4845
Published online May 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.4839
Table 1 Rate of colectomy after therapy with Infliximab
Ref.RCTPts (w)Tipe off diseaseFURate of colectomy in IFX PtsRate of colectomy in control PtsP value
Rutgeerts et al[51] Sandborn et al[52]Y364 (IFX) 364 (control)Moderate to severe UC54 wk (ACT1)9.5%14.7%< 0.05
30 wk (ACT2)
Sands et al[53]Y8 (IFX) 3 (control)Severe active steroid-refractory2 wk50%100%NS
Järnerot et al[25]Y24 (IFX) 21 (control)Severe to moderate UC not responding to conventional therapy3 mo29.2%66.7%0.017
Gustavsson et al[54]Y24 (IFX) 21 (control)Severe to moderate UC not responding to conventional therapy36 mo50%76%0.012
Aratari et al[56]N15 (IFX)Severe steroid-refractory UC26 mo18%
Teisner et al[57]N52 (IFX)Acute, severe and chronic refractory UC22 mo27%
Ferrante et al[58]N121 (IFX)Acute severe refractory UC33 mo17%--
Oussalah et al[59]N191 (IFX) MulticenterUC18 mo18.8%--
Desmond et al[60]N21 (IFX)UC14 mo9.5%--
Garcia-Planella et al[61]N22 (IFX)UC84 mo27.3%--
Table 2 Rate of overall post-operative morbidity and post-operative infectious complications in patients pre-operatively treated with Infliximab
Ref.RCTPts (IFX vscontrol ) (n)PO morbidity(IFX vs control )P valuePO infectious complications (IFX vs control)P value
Schluender et al[64]N17 vs 13436% vs 28%> 0.0518% vs 8%> 0.05
Selvasekar et al[62]N47 vs 25462% vs 49%0.1028% vs 10%< 0.01
Mor et al[63]N46 vs 4634.8% vs 15.2%0.00421.7% vs 2.2%0.011
Ferrante et al[65]N22 vs 11911.1% vs 28.6%> 0.059% vs 24%0.161
Gainsbury et al[66]N29 vs 5244.8% vs 44.2%0.9617.2% vs 26.9%0.32
Rizzo et al[67]N16 vs 2237.5% vs 22.7%> 0.0518.7% vs 18.2%> 0.05