Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2013; 19(9): 1424-1437
Published online Mar 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i9.1424
Table 1 Forty-two studies were included in the analysis of endoscopically resected patients
AuthorEMR/ESDPatientsSurgeryADC/SCCPositive resection marginOther therapyLocal recurrenceMeta-chronousN (+)L (+)Re-classificationGrade 3In situPiecemeal resection
Buttar et al[10]EMR170ADC3PDT80
Chaves et al[11]ESD5SCC0031
Chennat et al[12]EMR493ADC0220
Ciocirlan et al[13]EMR512SCC14CHEMO820436
Conio et al[14]EMR393ADC0121050
Ell et al[15]EMR645ADCPDT/APC63660
Espinel et al[16]EMR41ADC100
Fujishiro et al[17]ESD43SCC7111240
Gerke et al[18]EMR41ADC9RFA300
Goda et al[19]EMR581SCCCRT10
Higuchi et al[20]EMR200SCC6CRT/APC000610
Hull et al[52]EMR10ADC20
Iguchi et al[21]EMR81SCC04
Ishihara et al[22]EMR/ESD70SCCCRT12040
Ishii et al[23]ESD351SCC2CHEMO01280
Larghi et al[24]EMR405ADCPDT/APC0619
Lewis et al[25]EMR1001ADC1PDT18
Lin et al[26]EMR91SCC0100107
Lopes et al[27]EMR411ADCAPC/CRT42142
Maish et al[28]EMR77ADC1040
Manner et al[6]EMR/ESD211ADC27APC32000
Naritaka et al[29]EMR131SCC2RT179
Nijhawan et al[30]EMR252ADCPDT011
Noguchi et al[31]EMR335SCCCRT051415
Nomura et al[32]EMR511SCCCRT43041
Nonaka et al[33]ESD251SCC3RT/CRT01000
Ohashi et al[90]EMR179SCC1368
Ono et al[34]ESD849SCC7CRT12200
Ota et al[35]EMR180SCC5CRT041130
Pech et al[3]EMR/ESD39SCC20PDT/CHEMO527110
Peters et al[53]EMR/ESD141ADC3717314
Pouw et al[37]EMR/ESD341ADCAPC31410
Prasad et al[39]EMR2525ADC17516
Repici et al[51]ESD202SCC1001230
Scheil-Bertram et al[40]EMR1616ADC161
Schröder et al[41]EMR16ADC/SCC93131
Shimizu et al[42]EMR82SCCAPC21216
Takeo et al[44]EMR295001510
Tanabe et al[46]EMR850SCC15APC/CRT5041
Teoh et al[47]EMR/ESD28SCC6RT/CRT11
Urabe et al[48]EMR/ESD122SCC656
Vieth et al[54]EMR295ADC2101022
Yokoyama et al[49]EMR170SCCRT7
Zehetner et al[50]EMR283ADC0RFA5322
Table 2 Meta-regression analysis of the methods of endoscopic resection according to the published studies (the random effects model was used)
EMR vs ESDCoefficient95%CIP valueFavors
Patients submitted to surgery0.401-2.912964, 3.714436 0.806None
Positive margin-0.741-3.362995, 1.881024 0.558None
Local recurrence-1.713-4.420582, 0.9937198 0.201None
Lymph node metastasis0.905-5.762587, 7.573427 0.762None
Metachronous cancer-1.804-4.350273, 0.7420371 0.143None
Procedural complications1.397-1.264597, 4.058631 0.289None
Stenosis7.322 3.810146, 10.83439< 0.001EMR
Piecemeal resection1
Number of cases-7.709-11.03803, -4.380844< 0.001ESD
Local recurrence-4.034-6.151498, -1.915559< 0.01ESD
Resection margins0.837-3.725993, 5.39999 0.678None
Table 3 Meta-regression analysis of the outcomes of endoscopic resection according to the histologic type of early esophageal cancer (the random effects model was used)
OutcomeHistologic typeLog-odds ratioSE95.0% lower confidence limit95.0% upper confidence limitOddsFavors
Patients submitted to surgeryADC-2.12060.6249-3.3454-0.895812%ADC
SCC4.13560.4038-4.9271-3.344037%P < 0.05
Positive marginsADC-2.37611.0181-4.3716-0.38069%None
SCC-2.56890.6973-3.9357-1.20227%
Local recurrenceADC-4.81890.1469-5.1068-4.53090.80%None
SCC-4.33470.2792-4.8819-3.78741%
Lymph node metastasisADC-3.05650.7714-4.5685-1.54455%None
SCC-4.76820.4413-5.6332-3.90320.90%
Metachronous cancerADC-2.80170.2384-3.2690-2.33446%None
SCC-4.60300.6059-5.7905-3.41551%
Pre- vs post-endoscopic tumor stageADC-0.54490.4316-1.3909 0.301153%-
SCC-0.82670.3324-1.4782-0.175239%
Table 4 Thirty-eight studies were included in the analysis of surgically resected patients
StudySCC/ADCsmsm1sm2sm3N+ smN+ sm1N+ sm2N+ sm3L+ smL+ sm1L+ sm2L+ sm3V+ smV+ sm1V+ sm2V+ sm3Grade III
Amano et al[55]SCC8310106347443915236
Araki et al[56]SCC58121828151410120486024
Bollschweiler et al[57] (ADC)ADC2294992075
Bollschweiler et al[57] (SCC)SCC223613111198
Buskens et al[58]ADC421613131203916041217
Cen et al[59]ADC51121420
Chino et al[91]SCC2258911164175666024
Eguchi et al[61]SCC36432196171111
Endo et al[92]SCC12118485551215349563554
Gockel et al[63]ADC158253111
Gockel et al[63]SCC157442110
Goseki et al[64]SCC301521228
Higuchi et al[20]SCC151533141477
Ide et al[65]SCC85265423
Ikeda et al[66]SCC451923
Kim et al[67]SCC1333627693965283018
Kimura et al[68]SCC269115
Kuwano et al[93]SCC2642201018106
Liu et al[71]ADC3710150
Makuuchi et al[72]SCC81182538334111860131928312920
Matsumoto et al[73]SCC87152646414826
Nakajima et al[74]SCC849294633052860429
Natsugoe et al[75]SCC922128434261125512521
Noguchi et al[31]SCC386102220131631481910118
Ohno et al[76]SCC162645
Paraf et al[77]ADC1215
Rice et al[78]ADC245123
Rice et al[78]SCC3113
Scheil-Bertram et al[40]ADC21721251049207110012
Schmidt et al[79]SCC523
Shiozaki et al[81]SCC1802173869283747119115157453182454
Soga et al[82]SCC4232
Tomita et al[83]SCC8911106851544232447
Tsutsui et al[84]SCC38817
Westerterp et al[85]ADC6625231818061259
Yoshikane et al[86]SCC17121141
Sepesi et al[80]ADC29141149342
Leers et al[70]ADC511992311416
Table 5 Meta-regression analysis of histologic parameters between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients according to the published studies (the random effects model was used)
Comparison of ADC vs SCCCoefficient95%CIP valueBetter status
Positive lymph nodes1.890 0.3945146, 3.384624< 0.01ADC
Lymphovascular invasion0.626-0.7032339, 1.9561550.340None
Microvascular invasion1.114-0.2682334, 2.4965380.108None
Grade 30.305-1.584654, 2.1951420.731None
Table 6 Number of patients with lymph node metastasis and lymphatic and vascular invasion according to the depth of tumor in the submucosal layer
Patients with diseases
Lymph node metastasis
sm (38 studies: n = 2149)1sm1 (n = 308)sm2 (n = 349)sm3 (n = 624)
SCCADCSCCADCSCCADCSCCADC
793/1779 (45%)95/370 (26%)60/224 (27%)8/84 (10%)107/296 (36%)11/53 (21%)301/544 (55%)39/80 (49%)
Lymphovascular invasion
sm (n = 1286)1sm1 (n = 134)sm2 (n = 150)sm3 (n = 209)
627/1090 (56%)76/196 (39%)58/111 (52%)2/23 (9%)88/135 (65%)4/15 (27%)118/184 (64%)19/25 (76%)
Microvascular invasion
sm (n = 1194)1sm1 (n = 104)sm2 (n = 185)sm3 (n = 251)
468/1161 (40%)6/33 (18%)19/97 (20%)1/7 (14%)67/183 (37%)0/2 (0%)114/239 (48%)0/12 (0%)