Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2013; 19(3): 389-393
Published online Jan 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i3.389
Table 1 Characteristics of 159 patients n (%)
CharacteristicsWith T1 colorectal cancerWithout metastasis(n = 153)With metastasis(n = 6)P value
Age, yr, mean ± SD60.7 ± 11.760.48 ± 11.8366.33 ± 7.0120.231
Gender0.099
Male80 (50.3)755
Female79 (49.7)781
Primary site0.647
Cecum3 (1.9)30
Ascending colon9 (5.7)81
Transverse colon6 (3.8)60
Descending colon6 (3.8)51
Sigmoid colon21 (13.2)201
Rectosigmoid8 (5.0)80
Rectum104 (65.4)1013
Anus canal2 (1.3)20
Pathology0.919
Well differentiated11 (6.9)110
Moderately differentiated83 (52.2)794
Poorly differentiated2 (1.3)20
Mucinous4 (2.5)40
Localized canceration59 (37.1)572
Lymphnode metastasis0.611
N0146 (91.8)1415
N111 (6.9)101
N22 (1.3)20
CEA, ng/mL, mean ± SD3.60 ± 4.013.29 ± 3.5011.35 ± 7.870.054
Table 2 Risk factors for lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer
ParameterOdds ratio (95%CI)P value
Lymph node metastasis
Age1.015 (0.970, 1.062)0.522
Gender0.986 (0.329, 2.954)0.980
Location0.518 (0.138, 1.943)0.330
Tumor size0.859 (0.287, 2.574)0.786
Histological grade0.929 (0.748, 1.155)0.509
CEA0.445 (0.115, 1.805)0.262
Distant metastasis
Age1.050 (0.969, 1.138)0.231
Gender0.192 (0.022, 1.685)0.137
Location0.485 (0.095, 2.491)0.386
Tumor size0.563 (0.100, 3.163)0.514
Histological grade1.365 (0.957, 1.945)0.086
LNM2.154 (0.234, 19.850)0.498
CEA (preoperation)18.400 (3.106, 109.006)0.001
Table 3 Details of distant metastasis patients
No.Age (yr)GenderLocationCEA (ng/mL)Histological gradeLNMDFSRecurrent sitePrognosis
162MaleAscending colon13.66Moderately differentiated0/38Liver and spleenDiseased
261MaleDescending colon24.00Localized canceration0/1523LiverSurvived
368MaleRectum15.00Moderately differentiated1/110LiverSurvived
463FemaleSigmoid colon7.91Moderately differentiated0/1030Liver and lungDiseased
580MaleRectum5.20Localized canceration0/211LiverSurvived