Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2012; 18(40): 5771-5778
Published online Oct 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i40.5771
Table 1 Baseline clinical characteristics of patients with intestinal Behcet’s disease
CharacteristicNo. of patient (%)
Age at diagnosis of BD (yr)38.5 ± 12.2
Age at diagnosis of intestinal BD (yr)41.4 ± 12.3
Gender (male:female)71:96 (42.5:57.5)
Systemic symptoms and signs of BD
Recurrent oral ulcer159 (95.2)
Recurrent genital ulcer78 (46.7)
Ocular lesion10 (6.0)
Skin lesion82 (49.1)
Positive pathergy test4 (2.4)
Arthritis or arthralgia66 (39.5)
Neurologic lesion0
Vascular lesion2 (1.2)
Clinical subtype of BD
Complete3 (1.8)
Incomplete78 (46.7)
Suspected53 (31.7)
Symptoms and signs of intestinal involvement
Abdominal pain120 (71.8)
Diarrhea142 (85.0)
Abdominal mass4 (2.4)
Tenderness119 (71.2)
Nausea/vomiting4 (2.4)
Melena/hematochezia31 (18.6)
Fistula4 (2.4)
Stenosis (intestinal obstruction)10 (6.0)
Abscess0
Perforation0
Current use of medication
5-ASA or sulfasalazine163 (97.6)
Azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine24 (14.4)
Colchicine80 (47.9)
Corticosteroid72 (43.1)
Patient global assessment
Well63 (37.7)
Mild53 (31.7)
Moderate45 (26.9)
Severe6 (3.6)
DAIBD74.9 ± 36.1 (5-155)
Quiescent ( ≤ 19)2 (1.2)
Mild (20-39)32 (19.2)
Moderate (40-74)50 (29.9)
Severe (≥ 75)83 (49.7)
Table 2 Baseline colonoscopic characteristics of patients with intestinal Behcet’s disease
CharacteristicNo. of patient (%)
Location of intestinal lesion4 (2.4)
Ileal area156 (93.4)
Ileocecal area25 (15.0)
Ascending colon18 (10.8)
Other colonic segment
Distribution of intestinal lesion
Localized involvement142 (85.0)
Diffuse involvement25 (15.0)
Number of intestinal ulcer
Solitary86 (51.5)
2-553 (31.7)
≥ 528 (16.8)
Depth of intestinal ulcer
Aphthous12 (7.2)
Shallow46 (27.5)
Deep109 (65.3)
Shape of intestinal ulcer
Oval79 (47.3)
Geographic52 (31.1)
Volcano36 (21.6)
Size of intestinal ulcer (mm)
< 511 (6.6)
5-1029 (17.4)
10-2045 (26.9)
≥ 2082 (49.1)
Margin of intestinal ulcer
Discrete75 (44.9)
Elevation13 (7.8)
Nodular elevation32 (19.2)
Marginal erythema47 (28.1)
Type of intestinal ulcer
Typical type94 (56.3)
Atypical type73 (43.7)
Diagnostic criteria of intestinal BD
Definite69 (41.3)
Probable82 (49.1)
Suspected16 (9.6)
Table 3 Univariate analysis of endoscopic factors associated with the disease activity index for intestinal Behcet’s disease
Endoscopic factorDAIBD (mean ± SD)F/t valueP value
Location0.480.632
Ileocecal area74.58 ± 36.74
Other80.00 ± 26.08
Distribution
Localized73.98 ± 35.22-0.820.414
Diffuse80.40 ± 41.10
Number of intestinal ulcer0.390.679
Solitary72.67 ± 30.92
2- 576.51 ± 41.75
≥ 578.93 ± 40.08
Depth of intestinal ulcer5.030.008
Aphthous57.08 ± 37.02
Shallow65.00 ± 30.09
Deep81.10 ± 37.01
Shape of intestinal ulcer13.33< 0.001
Oval65.13 ± 37.79
Geographic72.60 ± 28.40
Volcano99.86 ± 30.95
Size of intestinal ulcer (mm)6.62< 0.001
< 552.73 ± 35.45
5-1069.48 ± 36.38
10-2063.00 ± 33.02
≥ 2086.40 ± 34.29
Margin of intestinal ulcer1.950.124
Discrete80.47 ± 37.70
Elevation56.54 ± 33.63
Nodular elevation75.47 ± 29.93
Marginal erythema70.85 ± 36.81
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of endoscopic factors associated with the disease activity index for intestinal Behcet’s disease
Endoscopic factorβcoefficientP value
Intercept47.44
Location
Ileocecal area0
Other9.040.389
Number of intestinal ulcer
Solitary0
≥ 211.850.031
Depth of intestinal ulcer
Aphthous0
Shallow5.030.651
Deep12.760.261
Shape of intestinal ulcer
Oval0
Geographic4.470.495
Volcano26.930.001
Size of intestinal ulcer (mm)
< 200
≥ 208.650.225
Table 5 Predicted and actual disease activity index for intestinal Behcet’s disease scores in intestinal Behcet’s disease patients
Actual DAIBDPredicted DAIBD by an endoscopic model
Total
Quiescent (19)Mild (20-39)Moderate (40-74)Severe (75)
Quiescent ( ≤ 19)00112
Mild (20-39)0028432
Moderate (40-74)00371350
Severe (≥ 75)00424183
Total0010859167