Clinical Research
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2006; 12(14): 2217-2222
Published online Apr 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i14.2217
Table 1 Characteristics of subjects (mean±SD, n = 159)
Age (yr)35.8 ± 10.5 (18-57)
Gender (M : F)53 : 106
Body weight (kg)56.3 ± 8.4 (41.0-78.5)
Body height (cm)161.7 ± 7.5 (144.5-181.3)
Body mass index (kg/m2)21.5 ± 2.6 (16.5-29.1)
Body surface area (m2)1.59 ± 0.14 (1.30-2.13)
Computed tomography liver volume (mL)1,099.10 ± 181.51
Right lobe graft volume on CT (mL)710.14 ± 131.46
Right lobe to total liver volume on CT (%)64.55 ± 4.47 %
Right lobe graft weight (g)598.90 ± 117.39
Estimated whole liver weight (g)927.54 ± 168.78
Table 2 Comparison of regression models
StudyFormulaMean ESLW (ESLV)Difference in ESLWP
Deland and North[11]ESLW = 1020 × BSA1– 2201 400.41 g- 472.86 g0.000a
Heinemann[7]ESLV = 1 072.8 × BSA1 - 345.71 141.67 g (1358.59 mL)- 214.12 g0.000a
Yoshizumi[17]ESLW = 772 × BSA21 225.50 g- 297.95 g0.000a
Yu[9]ESLV = 21.585× BW(kg)0.732× BH(cm)0.2251 087.32 g (1293.91 mL)- 159.77 g0.000a
Choukér[12]ESLW = 452 + 16.434 × BW(kg) + 11.85 × age – 166 × gender (F=1, M=0)1 690.90 g- 763.35 g0.000a
Urata[4]ESLV = 706.2 × BSA1 + 2.4944.79 g (1124.30 mL)- 17.24 g0.098
Vauthey[8]ESLV = 1 267.28 × BSA2 -794.411 022.95 g (1217.30 mL)- 95.40 g0.000a
Lee[18]ESLV = 691 × BSA1 + 951 002.31 g (1192.75 mL)- 74.76 g0.000a
Lin[10]ESLV = BH × 13 + BW × 12 - 15301 048.85 g (1248.13 mL)- 121.30 g0.000a
This studyESLW = 218.32 + BW × 12.29 + gender × 50.74 (M=1, F=0)927.47 g7.60E-20.994
Calculated liver weight927.54 g
Conversion factor 1.19 mL/gpaired samples t test aP < 0.05