Brief Reports
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 15, 2004; 10(14): 2147-2149
Published online Jul 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i14.2147
Table 1 Relationship between MVD and metastasis, capsular integrity, or size of tumor
ClassificationCases (n)MVD (mean ± SD)
Metastasis+3639.3 ± 9.6a
-2232.2 ± 5.6
Capsular-3838.8 ± 9.3a
+2031.2 ± 5.8
Integrity> 5 cm4237.3 ± 8.8
Size ≤ 5 cm1636.9 ± 8.7
Table 2 MVD in HCC and adjacent normal liver tissues
GroupCases (n)MVD (mean ± SD)
Adjacent normal tissue5813.2 ± 2.7
HCC grade I1119.6 ± 3.7
HCC grade II2229.7 ± 6.1a
HCC grade III1648.4 ± 10.7a
HCC grade IV959.3 ± 10.5a
Table 3 Relationship between telomerase activity in HCC or adjacent normal liver tissues and some clinical factors
GroupHCC
Adjacent normal tissues
CasesPositive numberPositive rate (%)PPositive numberPositive rate (%)P
DifferentiationHigh11654.400
Middle383797.4513.2
Low99100< 0.05777.8< 0.05
Size ≤ 5 cm161487.5318.8
> 5 cm423890.9> 0.05921.4> 0.05
Capsule-201680.015.0
Integrity+383694.7> 0.051129.8< 0.05
Hepatitis virus+484491.6122.9
Infection-10880.0> 0.05110.0< 0.05
Nod numberMono-nod151280.016.7
Multi-nod434093.0> 0.05< 0.05
Metastasis+363494.41027.8
-221881.8> 0.0529.1< 0.05
Table 4 Relationship between telomerase activity and MVD in HCC or adjacent normal liver tissues
GroupHCCAdjacent normal tissue
Group with positive telomerase activity49.3 ± 7.8a16.2 ± 2.7a
Group with negative telomerase activity31.2 ± 5.811.9 ± 1.4