|P.O.Box 2345, Beijing 100023,China||World J Gastroenterol 2003 Jan 15;9(1):99-103|
|Email: email@example.com||WJG ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/ R|
|http:// www.wjgnet.com||Copyright © 2003 by The WJG Press|
Nested case-control study on the risk factors of colorectal cancer
Kun Chen, Jian Cai, Xi-Yong Liu, Xi-Yuan Ma, Kai-Yan Yao, Shu Zheng
Kun Chen, Jian Cai,
Department of Epidemiology, Zhejiang University School of Public Health,
Hangzhou, 310006, Zhejiang Province, China
Xi-Yong Liu, Shu Zheng, Cancer Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang Province, China
Xin-Yuan Ma, Kai-Yan Yao, Institute of Cancer Research and Prevention, Jiashan County,314000, Zhejiang Province, China
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 30170828
Correspondence to: Kun Chen, Department of Epidemiology, Zhejiang University School of Public Health, 353 Yan-an Road, Hangzhou,310006 Zhejiang Province, China. firstname.lastname@example.org
Received: 2002-04-29 Accepted: 2002-06-08
AIM: To investigate the risk factors of colon cancer and rectal cancer.
METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted in a cohort of 64 693 subjects who participated in a colorectal cancer screening program from 1989 to 1998 in Jiashan county, Zhejiang, China. 196 cases of colorectal cancer were detected from 1990 to 1998 as the case group and 980 non-colorectal cancer subjects, matched with factors of age, gender, resident location, were randomly selected from the 64 693 cohort as controls. By using univariate analysis and mutivariate conditional logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio (OR) and its 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI) were calculated between colorectal cancer and personal habits, dietary factors, as well as intestinal related symptoms.
RESULTS: The mutivariate analysis results showed that after matched with age, sex and resident location, mucous blood stool history and mixed sources of drinking water were closely associated with colon cancer and rectal cancer, OR values for the mucous blood stool history were 3.508 (95 %CI: 1.370-8.985) and 2.139 (95 %CI: 1.040-4.402) respectively; for the mixed drinking water sources, 2.387 (95 %CI: 1.243-4.587) and 1.951 (95 %CI: 1.086-3.506) respectively. All reached the significant level with a P-value less than 0.05.
CONCLUSION: The study suggested that mucous blood stool history and mixed sources of drinking water were the risk factors of colon cancer and rectal cancer. There was no any significant association between dietary habits and the incidence of colorectal cancer.
Chen K, Cai J, Liu XY, Ma XY, Yao KY, Zheng S. Nested case-control study on the risk factors of colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9(1): 99-103
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors[1-6]. During the past decades, the incidence of colorectal cancer was increased all around the world, more than 500 000 cases were diagnosed as colorectal cancer per year. In the east of China, there has been a higher incidence of colorectal cancer. In Jiashan County, the mortality rate of colorectal cancer was the highest among China, which is about 20/100 000 per year .
The causes of colorectal cancer are generally regarded as two aspects: heredity and environment[8-10]. The former includes family history of cancer, intestinal polyp history, and so on. The later includes particularly dietary habit and physical activity.
Nested Case-Control Study (NCCS), an analytical epidemiological study method, was first presented by Mantel N, an American epidemiologist, in 1973, and it was widely used after 1980's[12-21]. All the subjects in such study are selected from a whole cohort, which is generally called cohort set. Compared with the cohort study, NCCS has the privilege of time-saving, money-saving, and trouble-saving; while compared to case-control study, since the exposure data are collected before the incident of disease, it is certain of the causes and time consequences relationship, and observational bias could be controlled efficiently. All of these characteristics of NCCS are suitable to the study of chronic disease, such as cancer.
There are many reports on the risk factors of colorectal cancer using classical case-control study method, however, few studies used nested case-control study method[22-29]. The purpose of this study is to explore the risk factors of colorectal cancer, providing evidence for the prevention of colorectal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Selection of cases and controls
A colorectal cancer screening program beginning on 1st May 1989 and ending on 30th April 1990 was conducted in ten countries which belonged to Jiashan county, Zhejiang province, China, including Weitan town, Yangmiao country, Xiadianmiao country, et al. From 75 842 eligible subjects aged 30 years and over, 64 693 subjects were enrolled as the base cohort set, the respondence rate was 85.3 %. Moreover, Jiashan county has founded cancer registration system and colorectal cancer report system, monitoring new cancer cases, including colorectal cancer. The cases in this study, who had participated in the 1989-1990 screening program, were the new colorectal cancer patients reported by Institute of Cancer Research and Prevention of Jiashan county. Up to 1998, the total number was 196 cases. Of which, 151 cases were pathological diagnosed, account for 77.1 %, 20 cases were diagnosed in the operation, 10.2 %, 23 cases were diagnosed by endoscopy, 11.7 %. Under the principle of same-country or town, same-sex, and no more than 3 years age disparity, 980 non-colorectal cancer subjects in the cohort set were selected as controls, resulting the final study subjects of 196 cases and 980 controls.
Contents of the study
The study contents composed of three parts as follow: (1). General characteristics: including age, sex, job types, educational levels, address et al; (2). Personal habits: including dietary habits, drinking water sources, alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking, et al; (3). Symptoms and disease history related with colorectal cancer: including changes of stool status, abdominal operation history, intestinal disease history, asthma history and allergy history, family cancer history, ancylostomiasis history, drug using history, psychic stimulation history, and so on.
Investigation methods and quality control
In the 1989-1990 screening investigation, a well-built Investigation Manual as the uniform criteria for inquiring the subjects and filling up the constructed questionnaire was used. All interviewers were trained focusing on the skills of inquiring. No subjects refused to be interviewed except that they were out of towns. For building the database, the questionnaires were coded and put into computer twice to control bias. The data used in this study were taken from this database.
Classical analysis methods of case-control study can be used to NCCS data, usually calculating OR value. In this study, Chi-square test was used in the univariate analysis of the data; conditional logistic regression was used in the multivariate analysis. The SPSS 10.0 for windows and the SAS system for windows, version 6.12, were used for completing all the statistical analyses.
In this study, there were 196 cases (84 colon cancer, 112 rectal cancer) and 980 controls. The distribution of age between cases and controls for male and female was shown in Table 1.
Table 1 The distribution of subjects by age and sex
The average age of case group
years, while that of the control group was 54.3±10.6
year, there was no statistically significant difference (t=0.127, P=0.899).For
sex, there was also no difference statistically (x2=0.001, P=0.979).
In order to control the possible confounding bias the age, sex and resident location were matched in the study design. Given that the risk factors of colon cancer might be different from that of rectal cancer, the analysis of the risk factors were separated into colon cancer and rectal cancer, instead of colorectal cancer. The OR and its 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI), x2 and P values in the univariate analysis were showed respectively in Table 2 and Table 3 (the variables showed P>0.20 were excluded).
Table 2 Results of univariate analysis for colon cancer (cases n=84, controls n=420)
|drining mixed water source* (y=1,n=0)||2.273||1.255||4.117||7.332||0.007|
|drining gutter water (y=1,n=0)||1.639||0.777||3.457||1.680||0.195|
|drining well water (y=1,n=0)||0.542||0.338||0.870||6.445||0.011|
|chronic diarrhea history(y=1,n=0)||2.018||1.003||4.060||3.871||0.049|
|appendix operating history(y=1,n=0)||1.707||0.873||3.334||2.446||0.118|
|intestinal polyps history(y=1,n=0)||6.503||2.009||21.049||9.762||0.002|
*drinking mixed water source
refers to the subjects drinking different type of water sources through his/her
lifetime ,mostly drinking river water and gutter water. So is Table 2,3 and 4
Table 3 Results of univariate analysis for rectal cancer (cases n=112, controls n=560)
|drining mixed water source (y=1,n=0)||2.021||1.170||3.491||6.363||0.011|
|mucious blood history (y=1,n=0)||2.138||1.122||4.072||5.335||0.021|
|defaecation drug using (y=1,n=0)||2.280||0.711||7.312||1.923||0.166|
|cholecyst excision history (y=1,n=0)||2.294||0.715||7.352||1.195||0.163|
In Table 2, it was showed that
four variables, well water drinking, mixed water source drinking, chronic
diarrhea history and intestinal polyp history, were significantly associated
with colon cancer (P<0.05). The factor of appendicitis history showed
an OR value close to significant level (P=0.066). For rectal cancer in
Table 3, there were two variables reached the significant level of P=0.05,
which were mixed water source drinking (OR=2.02) and mucous blood stool history
The variables showing associations with the risk of colon cancer and rectal cancer at P<0.15 level were further tested in forward stepwise conditional logistic regression models. The final model consisted of those variables showing a significant association with the risk of colorectal cancer at P<0.05 level. Results were showed in Table 4 and Table 5 for colon and rectal cancers, respectively.
Table 4 Results of multivariate analysis for colon cancer
|drining mixed source water (y=1,n=0)||2.387||1.243||4.587||0.009|
|mucous blood history (y=1, n=0)||3.508||1.370||8.985||0.009|
Table 4 and Table 5 illustrated
that, at P=0.05 level, both for colon cancer and rectal cancer, the final
logistic regression model comprised two factors: mixed water source drinking and
mucous blood stool history.
Table 5 Results of multivariate analysis for rectal cancer
|drinking mixed water source (y=1, n=0)||1.951||1.086||3.506||0.025|
|mucous blood history (y=1, n=0)||2.139||1.040||4.402||0.039|
It is generally believed that colorectal cancer is the combined outcome of heredity and environment[8-10,30]. Despite uncertainties regarding the underlying association between heredity and colorectal cancer, the genetic factors may affect the individual sensitivity to cancer[3,30-37]; many documents had reported that the environmental factors might also influence colorectal cancer[37-49]. On the secondary prevention for colorectal cancer, symptoms and/or disorders of pre-cancer, such as intestinal polyps, ulcerative colitis, should be considered[50,51].
Univariate analysis results of this study showed that drinking well water is a protective factor for colon cancer, OR value was 0.542, (P<0.05); drinking mixed water, mostly drinking river water and gutter water, was a risk factor both for colon cancer and rectal cancer, OR values were 2.387 (95 %CI: 1.247-4.587) and 1.951 (95 %CI: 1.086-3.506) in multivariate conditional logistic model, respectively. The association between drinking mixed water and colorectal cancer is consistent with former study. In this study, country subjects account for about 75 %, most of the mixed water drinking aggregated in country. In the local country, people usually were drinking river water and well water. It reflects that uncertainty of drinking water source, especially mixed drinking river water and gutting water would increase the incidence of colon cancer and rectal cancer. The findings in this study resembled other study reports[47,52].
Chronic diarrhea, mucous blood stool and constipation history are the pre-clinical symptoms of colorectal cancer[53-56]. This study has found the positive association between mucous blood stool history and colorectal cancer. In final colon cancer logistic model and rectal cancer logistic model, the OR values of mucous blood stool history were 3.508 (95 %CI: 1.370-8.985) and 2.139 (95 %CI: 1.04-4.402) respectively, both reached statistical significant level. Univariate analysis also showed that, for colon cancer, the OR value of chronic diarrhea history was 2.018 (95 %CI: 1.023-4.06), P<0.05, but did not enter the final logistic regression model.
Intestinal polyp history commonly regarded as a high risk factor for colorectal cancer[57-65]. Although the univariate analysis result showed a positive association between intestinal polyp history and colon cancer, OR=6.503 (95 %CI: 2.009-21.049), P<0.05, after being matched with age, sex and location, the factor did not enter the final logistic regression model. However, the association between intestinal polyp history and rectal cancer could not reach the significant level even in the univariate analysis.
Although the association between dietary habits and colorectal cancer has been reported[35,38,39,41,45,49, 66,67], this study was not able to confirm such a positive association. It was reported that increasing fat while reducing fibrous in diet would increase the incidence of colorectal cancer[68-70]. In this study, after merging the two variables, pork eating and vegetable eating, into one variable by cross-difference method, we got a negative association. Red meat eating, such as fish cooked with soy souse, was reported to be the risk factor of colorectal cancer, but the result of this did not agree with that. Moreover, recent reports were not consistent with each other about the association between cigarette smoking and colorectal cancer, nor does the alcohol consumption[71-76]. This study did not find any statistical association between cigarette smoking, nor was alcohol consumption and colorectal cancer.
Nested case control study, namely case control study within cohort, is based on a cohort set. After baseline investigation for the cohort set, including population structure, exposure factors and pertinent factors, the study subjects are divided into two groups: the disease individuals form the case group and the individuals of control group need to be randomly selected from the non-disease subjects. This kind of study can be analyzed statistically as a case-control study. The risk factors found in nested one are certain in cause and time consequence. In addition, the number of case in this study was abundance after ten years of follow-up; the controls were randomly selected from the whole disease-free cohort set and can represent the normal public population well. All of these endue the results with persuasion.
It should be noted that, after ten years of follow-up, some exposure factors may have changed, factors such as dietary habits, drinking water sources, intestinal disease history may be different from the primate investigation. All the changes may discount the preciseness of the conclusion. That the association between dietary habits and colorectal cancer could not be put forward any positive evidence might be explained by such changes.
1 Zhang YL, Zhang ZS, Wu BP, Zhou DY. Early diagnosis for colorectal cancer in China. World J
Gastroenterol 2002; 8: 21-25
2 Thiis Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J, Majak BM, Vatn MH. Flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy as a screening modality
for colorectal adenomas in older age groups? Findings in a cohort of the normal population aged 63-72 years.
GUT 1999; 45: 834-839
3 Colonna M, Grosclaude P, Faivre J, Revzani A, Arveux P, Chaplain G, Tretarre B, Launoy G, Lesec'h JM, Raverdy N, Schaffer
P, Buemi A, Menegoz F, Black RJ. Cancer registry data based estimation of regional cancer incidence: application to breast
and colorectal cancer in French administrative regions. J Epidemio Community Heath 1999; 53: 558-564
4 Smalley W, Ray WA, Daugherty J, Griffin MR. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and incidence of colorectal
cancer: a population-based study. Arch Int Medic 1999; 159: 161-166
5 Soliman AS, Smith MA, Cooper SP, Ismail K, Khaled H, Ismail S, McPherson RS, Seifeldin IA, Bondy ML. Serum
organochlorine pesticide levels in patients with colorectal cancer in Egypt. Arch Environ Health 1997; 52: 409-415
6 Kee F, Wilson R, Currie S, Sloan J, Houston R, Rowlands B, Moorehead J. Socioeconomic circumstances and the risk of
bowel cancer in Northern Ireland. J Epidemio Community Health 1996;50: 640-644
7 LiuXY, Zheng S, Chen K, Ma XY, Zhou L, Yu H, Yao KY, Chen K, Cai SR, Zhang SZ. Randomized controlled trial of
sequence mass screening program for colorectal cancer. Zhonghua Liuxing Bingxue Zazhi 2000; 21: 430-433
8 Haile RW, Siegmund KD, Gauderman WJ, Thomas DC. Studydesign issues in the development of the University of
Southern California Consortium's Colorectal Cancer Family Registry. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999; 26: 89-93
9 Campbell T. Colorectal cancer. Part 1: Epidemiology, aetiology, screening and diagnosis. Prof Nurse 1999; 14: 869-874
10 Coughlin SS, Miller DS. Public health perspectives on testing for colorectal cancer susceptibility genes. Am J Prev
Med 1999; 16: 99-104
11 Mantel N. Synthetic retrospective studies and related topics. Biometrics 1973; 29: 479-490
12 Hellard ME, Sinclair MI, Fairley CK, Andrews RM, Bailey M, Black J, Dharmage SC, Kirk MD. An outbreak of cryptosporidiosis
in an urban swimming pool: why are such outbreaks difficult to detect? Aust N Z J Public Health 2000; 24: 272-275
13 McDonald AD, McDonald JC, Rando RJ, Hughes JM, Weill H. Cohort mortality study of North American industrial sand
workers. I. Mortality from lung cancer, silicosis and other causes. Ann Occup Hyg 2001; 45: 193-199
14 Coker AL, Gerasimova T, King MR, Jackson KL, Pirisi L. High-risk HPVs and risk of cervical neoplasia: a nested case-
control study. Exp Mol Pathol 2001; 70: 90-95
15 Josefsson AM, Magnusson PK, Ylitalo N, Sorensen P, QwarforthTubbin P, Andersen PK, Melbye M, Adami HO, Gyllensten
UB. Viral load of human papilloma virus 16 as a determinant for development of cervical carcinoma in situ: a
nested case-control study. Lancet 2000; 355: 2189-2193
16 Akre O, Lipworth L, Tretli S, Linde A, Engstrand L, Adami HO, Melbye M, Andersen A, Ekbom A. Epstein-Barr virus
and cytomegalovirus in relation to testicular-cancer risk: a nested case-control study. Int J Cancer 1999; 82: 1-5
17 DelAmo J, Petruckevitch A, Phillips AN, De Cock KM, Stephenson J, Desmond N, Hanscheid T, Low N, Newell A, Obasi A,
Paine K, Pym A, Theodore C, Johnson AM. Risk factors for tuberculosis in patients with AIDS in London: a case-control study.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999; 3: 12-17
18 Mathews WC, Caperna J, Toerner JG, Barber RE, Morgenstern H. Neutropenia is a risk factor for gram-negative
bacillus bacteremia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: results of a nested case-control study. Am J
Epidemiol 1998; 148: 1175-1183
19 Wideroff L, Potischman N, Glass AG, Greer CE, Manos MM, Scott DR, Burk RD, Sherman ME, Wacholder S, Schiffman
M. A nested case-control study of dietary factors and the risk of incident cytological abnormalities of the cervix. Nutr
Cancer 1998; 30: 130-136
20 Deacon JM, Evans CD, Yule R, Desai M, Binns W, Taylor C, Peto J. Sexual behaviour and smoking as determinants of
cervical HPV infection and of CIN3 among those infected: a case-control study nested within the Manchester cohort. Br J
Cancer 2000; 83: 1565-1572
21 Ylitalo N, Sorensen P, Josefsson AM, Magnusson PK, Andersen PK, Ponten J, Adami HO, Gyllensten UB, Melbye M.
Consistent high viral load of human papillomavirus 16 and risk of cervical carcinoma in situ: a nested case-control study.
Lancet 2000; 355: 2194-2198
22 Garcia Rodriguez LA, Huerta Alvarez C. Reduced incidence of colorectal adenoma among long-term users of
nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: a pooled analysis of published studies and a new population-based study.
Epidemiology 2000; 11: 376-381
23 Knekt P, Hakulinen T, Leino A, Heliovaara M, Reunanen A, Stevens R. Serum albumin and colorectal cancer risk. Eur J Clin
Nutr 2000; 54: 460-462
24 Bertario L, Russo A, Crosignani P, Sala P, Spinelli P, Pizzetti P, Andreola S, Berrino F. Reducing colorectal cancer mortality
by repeated faecal occult blood test: a nested case-control study. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35: 973-977
25 Collet JP, Sharpe C, Belzile E, Boivin JF, Hanley J, Abenhaim L. Colorectal cancer prevention by non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs: effects of dosage and timing. Br J Cancer 1999; 81: 62-68
26 Kato I, Dnistrian AM, Schwartz M, Toniolo P, Koenig K, Shore RE, Akhmedkhanov A, ZeleniuchJacquotte A, Riboli E.
Serum folate, homocysteine and colorectal cancer risk in women: a nested case-control study. Br J
Cancer 1999; 79: 1917-1922
27 Kato I, Dnistrian AM, Schwartz M, Toniolo P, Koenig K, Shore RE, ZeleniuchJacquotte A, Akhmedkhanov A, Riboli E. Iron
intake, body iron stores and colorectal cancer risk in women: a nested case-control study. Int J Cancer 1999; 80: 693-698
28 Karlen P, Kornfeld D, Brostrom O, Lofberg R, Persson PG, Ekbom A. Is colonoscopic surveillance reducing colorectal
cancer mortality in ulcerative colitis? A population based case control study. Gut 1998; 42: 711-714
29 Meijer GA, Baak JP, Talbot IC, Atkin WS, Meuwissen SG. Predicting the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer in patients
with rectosigmoid adenoma using quantitative pathological features. A case-control study. J Pathol 1998; 184: 63-70
30 Hemminki K, Lonnstedt I, Vaittinen P, Lichtenstein P. Estimation of genetic and environmental components in colorectal and
lung cancer and melanoma. Genet Epidemiol 2001; 20: 107-116
31 Chapman PD, Burn J. Genetic predictive testing for bowel cancer predisposition: the impact on the individual. Cytogenet
Cell Genet 1999; 86: 118-124
32 Thorson AG, Knezetic JA, Lynch HT. A century of progress in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome).
Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 1-9
33 Briskey EN, Pamies RJ. Colorectal cancer: update on recent advances and their impact on screening protocols. J Natl
Med Assoc 2000; 92: 222-230
34 Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, Iliadou A, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M, Pukkala E, Skytthe A, Hemminki K.
Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer-analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark,
and Finland. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 78-85
35 Marchand LL. Combined influence of genetic and dietary factors on colorectal cancer incidence in Japanese Americans.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999; 26: 101-105
36 Bonaiti Pellie C. Genetic risk factors in colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 1999; 8 (Suppl 1): S27-32
37 Ponz de Leon M, Pedroni M, Benatti P, Percesepe A, Rossi G, Genuardi M, Roncucci L. Epidemiologic and genetic factor
in colorectal cancer: development of cancer in dizygotic twins in a family with Lynch syndrome. Ital J Gastroenterol
Hepatol 1999; 31: 218-222
38 Prichard PJ, Tjandra JJ. Colorectal cancer. Med J Aust 1998; 169: 493-498
39 Rafter J, Glinghammar B. Interactions between the environment and genes in the colon. Eur J Cancer Prev 1998; 7
(Suppl 2): S69-74
40 Gandhi SK, Reynolds MW, Boyer JG, Goldstein JL. Recurrence and malignancy rates in a benign colorectal neoplasm
patient cohort: results of a 5-year analysis in a managed care environment. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 2761-2767
41 Ritenbaugh C. Diet and prevention of colorectal cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2000; 2: 225-233
42 Hemminki K, Lonnstedt I, Vaittinen P, Lichtenstein P. Estimation of genetic and environmental components in colorectal and
lung cancer and melanoma. Genet Epidemiol 2001; 20: 107-116
43 Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, Iliadou A, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M, Pukkala E, Skytthe A, Hemminki K.
Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer-analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark,
and Finland. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 78-85
44 Park JG, Park YJ, Wijnen JT, Vasen HF. Gene-environment interaction in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer
with implications for diagnosis and genetic testing. Int J Cancer 1999; 82: 516-519
45 Jansen MC, Bueno de Mesquita HB, Buzina R, Fidanza F, Menotti A, Blackburn H, Nissinen AM, Kok FJ, Kromhout D. Dietary
fiber and plant foods in relation to colorectal cancer mortality: the Seven Countries Study. Int J Cancer 1999; 81: 174-179
46 Gertig DM, Hunter DJ. Genes and environment in the etiology of colorectal cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 1998; 8: 285-298
47 Gulis G, Fitz O, Wittgruber J, Suchanova G. Colorectal cancer and environmental pollution. Cent Eur J Public
Health 1998; 6: 188-191
48 Van Kranen HJ, van Iersel PW, Rijnkels JM, Beems DB, Alink GM, van Kreijl CF. Effects of dietary fat and a vegetable-
fruit mixture on the development of intestinal neoplasia in the ApcMin mouse. Carcinogenesis 1998; 19: 1597-1601
49 Kenji T, Hedio O, Yasuharu O, Iwao Y, Tomohiro S, Katsuya Y, Kiichi M, Shigeru T, Hideki A. Dietary factors and prevention
of colon cancer. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1998; 99: 368-372
50 Charalambopoulos A, Syrigos KN, Ho JL, Murday VA, Leicester RJ.Colonoscopy in symptomatic patients with positive
family history of colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 2000; 20: 1991-1994
51 Winawer SJ. Natural history of colorectal cancer. Am J Med 1999;106: 3S-6S, 50S-51S
52 Wang ZQ, He J, Chen W, Chen Y, Zhou TS, Lin YC. Relationship between different sources of drinking water, water
quality improvement and gastric cancer mortality in Changle County-A retrospective-cohort study in high incidence area.
World J Gastroenterol 1998; 4: 45-47
53 Martinez Martinez L, Lopez Santamaria M, Prieto Bozano G, Molina Arias M, Jimenez Alvarez C, Tovar Larrucea JA.
Diagnosis and therapeutic options in chronic idiopathic intestinal pseudo-obstruction: review of 16 cases.Cir
Pediatr 1999; 12: 71-74
54 Browning SM. Constipation, diarrhea, and irritable bowel syndrome. Prim Care 1999; 26: 113-139
55 Ho KY, Kang JY, Seow A. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in a multiracial Asian population, with particular reference
to reflux-type symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 1816-1822
56 Iacono G, Cavataio F, Montalto G, Florena A, Tumminello M, Soresi M, Notarbartolo A, Carroccio A. Intolerance of cow's
milk and chronic constipation in children. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1100-1104
57 Lal G, Ash C, Hay K, Redston M, Kwong E, Hancock B, Mak T, Kargman S, Evans JF, Gallinger S. Suppression of intestinal
polyps in Msh2-deficient and non-Msh2-deficient multiple intestinal neoplasia mice by a specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor
and by a dual cyclooxygenase-1/2 inhibitor. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 6131-6136
58 Rex DK. Surveillance colonoscopy following resection of colorectal polyps and cancer. Can J
Gastroenterol 2001; 15: 57-59
59 Anderson J. Clinical practice guidelines. Review of the recommendations for colorectal screening.
Geriatrics 2000; 55: 67-73, quiz 74
60 Katsumata T, Igarashi M, Kobayashi K, Sada M, Yokoyama K, Saigenji K. Usefulness of endoscopic polypectomy in
early colorectal cancer. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1999; 100: 782-786
61 Tobi M. Polyps as biomarkers for colorectal neoplasia. Front Biosci 1999; 4: 329-338
62 Gruber M, Lance P. Colorectal cancer detection and screening. Lippincotts Prim Care Pract 1998; 2: 369-376,
63 Kennedy BP, Soravia C, Moffat J, Xia L, Hiruki T, Collins S, Gallinger S, Bapat B. Overexpression of the nonpancreatic
secretory group II PLA2 messenger RNA and protein in colorectal adenomas from familial adenomatous polyposis
patients. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 500-503
64 Luo YQ, Ma LS, Zhao YL, Wu KC, Pan BR, Zhang XY. Expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in polyps from
large intestine. World J Gastroenterol 1999; 5: 160-164
65 Steindorf K, Tobiasz Adamczyk B, Popiela T, Jedrychowski W, Penar A, Matyja A, Wahrendorf J. Combined risk
assessment of physical activity and dietary habits on the development of colorectal cancer. A hospital-based case-control
study in Poland. Eur J Cancer Prev 2000; 9: 309-316
66 Negri E, Franceschi S, Parpinel M, La Vecchia C. Fiber intake and risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers
Prev 1998; 7: 667-671
67 Jarvinen R, Knekt P, Hakulinen T, Rissanen H, Heliovaara M. Dietary fat, cholesterol and colorectal cancer in
a prospective study. Br J Cancer 2001; 85: 357-361
68 Franceschi S, Favero A. The role of energy and fat in cancers of the breast and colon-rectum in a southern
European population. Ann Oncol 1999; 10(Suppl): 661-663
69 Rieger MA, Parlesak A, Pool Zobel BL, Rechkemmer G, Bode C. A diet high in fat and meat but low in dietary fibre
increases the genotoxic potential of "aecal water" Carcinogenesis 1999; 20: 2311-2316
70 Giovannucci E. An updated review of the epidemiological evidence that cigarette smoking increases risk of colorectal
cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001; 10: 725-731
71 Gertig DM, Stampfer M, Haiman C, Hennekens CH, Kelsey K, Hunter DJ. Glutathione S-transferase GSTM1
and GSTT1 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: a prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers
Prev 1998; 7: 1001-1005
72 Terry P, Ekbom A, Lichtenstein P, Feychting M, Wolk A. Long-term tobacco smoking and colorectal cancer in
a prospective cohort study. Int J Cancer 2001; 91: 585-587
73 Chao A, Thun MJ, Jacobs EJ, Henley SJ, Rodriguez C, Calle EE. Cigarette smoking and colorectal cancer mortality in the
cancer prevention study II. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1888-1896
74 Yoshioka M, Katoh T, Nakano M, Takasawa S, Nagata N, Itoh H. Glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1,T1,
P1, N-acetyltransferase (NAT) 1 and 2 genetic polymorphisms and susceptibility to colorectal cancer.
J UOEH 1999; 21: 133-147
75 Sinha R, Chow WH, Kulldorff M, Denobile J, Butler J, Garcia Closas M, Weil R, Hoover RN, Rothman N. Well done, grilled
red meat increases the risk of colorectal adenomas. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 4320-4324
76 Neugut AI, Rosenberg DJ, Ahsan H, Jacobson JS, Wahid N, Hagan M, Rahman MI, Khan ZR, Chen L, Pablos Mendez A,
Shea S. Association between coronary heart disease and cancers of the breast, prostate, and colon. Cancer
Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998; 7: 869-873
Edited by Zhao M