Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2026; 32(48): 121672
Published online Dec 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121672
Published online Dec 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121672
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for overall survival of patients with gastric cancer
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||
| HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | Reference | Reference | ||
| Female | 1.17 (0.89-1.54) | 0.265 | 1.03 (0.77-1.38) | 0.822 |
| Age | ||||
| < 60 | Reference | Reference | ||
| ≥ 60 | 1.34 (1.02-1.75) | 0.034 | 1.24 (0.94-1.64) | 0.124 |
| Clinical stage | ||||
| I, II | Reference | |||
| III | 4.00 (2.85-5.59) | < 0.001 | ||
| T stage | ||||
| T1, T2 | Reference | Reference | ||
| T3 | 2.53 (1.36-4.71) | 0.003 | 2.10 (1.02-4.33) | 0.044 |
| T4 | 5.44 (3.16-9.39) | < 0.001 | 3.98 (2.06-7.70) | < 0.001 |
| N stage | ||||
| N0, N1 | Reference | Reference | ||
| N2 | 2.49 (1.75-3.54) | < 0.001 | 1.62 (1.12-2.34) | 0.010 |
| N3 | 4.33 (3.12-6.01) | < 0.001 | 1.56 (1.08-2.25) | 0.017 |
| Differentiation | ||||
| Moderate, good | Reference | Reference | ||
| Poor | 1.96 (1.49-2.59) | < 0.001 | 1.33 (0.98-1.80) | 0.065 |
| Vascular invasion | ||||
| Negative | Reference | Reference | ||
| Positive | 2.11 (1.61-2.77) | < 0.001 | 1.18 (0.88-1.58) | 0.259 |
| CEA elevation | ||||
| No | Reference | Reference | ||
| Yes | 4.21 (3.23-5.49) | < 0.001 | 2.71 (2.01-3.66) | < 0.001 |
| CA19-9 elevation | ||||
| No | Reference | Reference | ||
| Yes | 3.28 (2.50-4.31) | < 0.001 | 2.84 (2.15-3.76) | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Zhang LX, Chang N, Su YZ, Zhang YH, Zhu XD, Zhu H, Zhou EZ, Sun MZ, Luo PQ, Xu AM, Liu Q, Wei ZJ. Prognostic value of postoperative CEA/CA19-9 positivity and elevation relative to preoperative levels in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(48): 121672
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i48/121672.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.121672