Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2025; 31(32): 109897
Published online Aug 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i32.109897
Published online Aug 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i32.109897
Table 4 Comparison of radiologic modalities in the diagnosis of epiploic appendagitis
Feature | Ultrasound | Computed tomography | Magnetic resonance imaging |
Utility | First-line in young, thin patients; pregnancy; bedside availability | Gold standard; most widely used modality | Alternative when CT is contraindicated (e.g., pregnancy, allergy to contrast) |
Key imaging features | Hyperechoic, non-compressible ovoid mass; no Doppler flow; mild surrounding edema | Oval fat-density lesion with hyperattenuating rim (“ring sign”) and central dot sign | T1-hyperintense lesion with T2-hyperintense rim; no contrast enhancement |
Sensitivity/specificity | Operator-dependent; moderate sensitivity and specificity | High sensitivity and specificity (> 90%) | Comparable to CT in skilled hands; limited data |
Advantages | No radiation; portable; repeatable | High resolution; widely available; detailed fat and bowel wall visualization | Excellent soft tissue contrast; radiation-free |
Limitations | May be limited by obesity or bowel gas; user expertise critical | Radiation exposure; contrast may be needed | High cost; limited availability; longer scan time |
Preferred use | Initial screening in selected populations (e.g., pediatrics, pregnant women) | Routine evaluation of acute abdominal pain | Problem-solving tool or radiation-sensitive patients |
- Citation: El-Sawaf Y, Alzayani S, Saeed NK, Bediwy AS, Elbeltagi R, Al-Roomi K, Al-Beltagi M. Epiploic appendagitis: An overlooked cause of acute abdominal pain. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(32): 109897
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i32/109897.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i32.109897