Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2025; 31(32): 109897
Published online Aug 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i32.109897
Table 4 Comparison of radiologic modalities in the diagnosis of epiploic appendagitis
Feature
Ultrasound
Computed tomography
Magnetic resonance imaging
UtilityFirst-line in young, thin patients; pregnancy; bedside availabilityGold standard; most widely used modalityAlternative when CT is contraindicated (e.g., pregnancy, allergy to contrast)
Key imaging featuresHyperechoic, non-compressible ovoid mass; no Doppler flow; mild surrounding edemaOval fat-density lesion with hyperattenuating rim (“ring sign”) and central dot signT1-hyperintense lesion with T2-hyperintense rim; no contrast enhancement
Sensitivity/specificityOperator-dependent; moderate sensitivity and specificityHigh sensitivity and specificity (> 90%)Comparable to CT in skilled hands; limited data
AdvantagesNo radiation; portable; repeatableHigh resolution; widely available; detailed fat and bowel wall visualizationExcellent soft tissue contrast; radiation-free
LimitationsMay be limited by obesity or bowel gas; user expertise criticalRadiation exposure; contrast may be neededHigh cost; limited availability; longer scan time
Preferred useInitial screening in selected populations (e.g., pediatrics, pregnant women)Routine evaluation of acute abdominal painProblem-solving tool or radiation-sensitive patients