Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2025; 31(31): 109630
Published online Aug 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109630
Published online Aug 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109630
Table 2 Effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine compared to dexamethasone on the postembolization syndrome and the association of the characteristic of hepatocellular carcinoma (beyond up to 7) on postembolization syndrome
Variables | PES (n = 27) | No PES (n = 29) | OR (95%CI) | P value | Adjusted OR | P value |
Treatment group | ||||||
N-acetylcysteine | 9 (32.1) | 19 (67.9) | 0.26 (0.09- 0.80) | 0.018 | 0.17 (0.03- 0.87) | 0.0331 |
Dexamethasone | 18 (64.3) | 10 (35.7) | Reference | Reference | ||
Beyond up to 7 | ||||||
Yes | 22 (56.4) | 17 (43.6) | 3.11 (0.92-10.52) | 0.069 | 1.00 (0.16-6.30) | 1.0002 |
No | 5 (29.4) | 12 (70.6) | Reference | Reference |
- Citation: Koonsiripaiboon P, Ruamtawee W, Simasingha N, Tanasoontrarat W, Claimon T, Sethasine S. Efficacy of N-acetylcysteine vs dexamethasone in preventing postembolization syndrome post-transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(31): 109630
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i31/109630.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109630