Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2025; 31(27): 106819
Published online Jul 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i27.106819
Table 1 Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence model for localization and lesion detection methods on the test dataset
Diagnostic performance (%) (95%CI)

Accuracy
Sensitivity
Specificity
PPV
NPV
AUC
Localization
    Stomach99.4 (99.4-99.4)98.7 (98.6-98.7)99.6 (99.6-99.6)98.6 (98.6-98.6)99.6 (99.6-99.7)100 (100.0-100.0)
    Small-bowel97.4 (97.4-97.4)96.1 (96.1-96.1)97.9 (97.9-97.9)94.7 (94.7-94.7)98.5 (98.5-98.5)99.5 (99.5-99.5)
    Colon97.5 (97.4-97.5)97.1 (97.1-97.1)97.8 (97.8-97.8)97.9 (97.9-97.9)97.0 (97.0-97.0)99.6 (99.6-99.6)
Detection of small-bowel abnormalities
    Normal 99.3 (99.3-99.3)99.5 (99.5-99.5)95.3 (95.2-95.5)99.8 (99.8-99.8)86.4 (86.5-86.9)99.1 (99.0-99.1)
    Abnormal
    Erosions/ulcers99.4 (99.4-99.4)90.1 (89.8-90.2)99.7 (99.7-99.7)89.1 (88.8-89.3)99.7 (99.7-99.7)98.9 (98.8-98.9)
    Angiodysplasia99.8 (99.8-99.8)100 (100.0-100.0)99.8 (99.8-99.8)58.8 (64.0-65.3)100 (100.0-100.0)99.7 (99.7-99.7)
    Bleeding99.9 (99.9-99.9)100 (100.0-100.0)99.9 (99.9-99.9)66.7 (71.9-73.6)100 (100.0-100.0)99.9 (99.9-99.9)