Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2025; 31(26): 107419
Published online Jul 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i26.107419
Table 8 Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging scores to evaluate post-operative recurrence in Crohn’s disease[61,62,85]
MRE disease activity score
MR score[62,85]
MONITOR Index[61]
Year20082022
MR protocolMR enteroclysisMR enterography
Study typeProspectiveProspective
Inception cohort (n)3061
Reference standardRutgeerts scoreGwet’s coefficient, Rutgeerts score
Bowel segments evaluatedAnastomosisAnastomosis
Neo-terminal ileumNeo-terminal ileum
Final radiological components(1) Mural thickening; (2) Mural oedema; (3) Ulceration; (4) Mural contrast enhancement; (5) Fat stranding; (6) Stenosis; (7) Prestenotic dilatation; (8) Fistula; (9) Abscess; and (10) Conglomeration tumor(1) Mural thickening; (2) Mural oedema; (3) Ulceration; (4) Mural contrast enhancement; (5) T2 hyperintensity; (6) DWI hyperintensity; and (7) Disease length
Scoring formulaMR0: Normal; MR1: Minor mucosal abnormalities: Minor wall thickening or mural contrast enhancement without stenosis; MR2: Moderate recurrence: Major bowel wall thickening or mural contrast enhancement or low-grade stenosis without pre-stenotic dilatation; MR3: Severe recurrence: MR2 plus transmural oedema with T2 hyperintensity and fat stranding or high-grade stenosis with pre-stenostic dilatation or extramural complications1 × presence of wall thickness; + 1 × presence of mural contrast enhancement; + 1 × presence of T2 hyperintensity; + 1 × presence of DWI hyperintensity; + 1 × presence of mural oedema; + 2.5 × presence of ulceration; + 1 × presence of disease length ≥ 20 mm