Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2025; 31(26): 107419
Published online Jul 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i26.107419
Published online Jul 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i26.107419
Ref. | MRE disease activity scores | Patients | Reference standard | Outcome |
Rimola et al[38] | MaRIA; Clermont score; London score | 43 | Active disease; Ileo-colonoscopy: SES-CD ≥ 2 | MaRIA ≥ 7: Sensitivity = 88%, specificity = 97%, AUROC = 0.92; Clermont score > 8.4: Sensitivity = 89%, specificity = 78%, AUROC = 0.84; London score ≥ 4.1: Sensitivity = 71%, specificity = 99%, AUROC = 0.85; MaRIA superior (all P < 0.05) |
Buisson et al[60] | MaRIA; Clermont score | 44 | Active disease; Ileo-colonoscopy: Presence of superficial ulceration | MaRIA ≥ 7: Sensitivity = 51.8%, specificity = 82.1%, AUROC = 0.67; Clermont score > 8.4: Sensitivity = 54.4%, specificity = 81.3%, AUROC = 0.68; No significant differences between scores (P > 0.05) |
Severe disease; Ileo-colonoscopy: Presence of deep ulceration | MaRIA ≥ 11: Sensitivity = 90.9%, specificity = 82.0%, AUROC = 0.86; Clermont score > 12.5: Sensitivity = 90.9%, specificity = 80.0%, AUROC = 0.86; No significant differences between scores (P > 0.05) | |||
Puylaert et al[52] | MaRIA; Clermont score; London score; CDMI | 98 | Active disease; Ileo-colonoscopy: CDEIS ≥ 3 | MaRIA ≥ 7: Sensitivity = 80%-84%, specificity = 62%-65%; Clermont score > 8.4: Sensitivity = 83%-85%, specificity = 64%; London score ≥ 3.4: Sensitivity = 79%-82%, specificity = 68%-71%; CDMI ≥ 3: Sensitivity = 77%-82%, specificity = 68%-71%; No significant differences between scores (all P > 0.05) |
Ulcerating disease; Ileo-colonoscopy: Presence of ulceration | MaRIA ≥ 11: Sensitivity = 76%-83%, specificity = 66%-68%; Clermont score > 12.5: Sensitivity = 79%-83%, specificity = 67%; London score ≥ 3.8: Sensitivity = 80%-83%, specificity = 61%-63%; No significant differences between scores (P > 0.05) | |||
Ordás et al[19] | MaRIA; sMaRIA | 98 | Active disease; Ileo-colonoscopy: Presence of any lesion | MaRIA ≥ 7: Sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 89%, AUROC = 0.89; sMaRIA ≥ 1: Sensitivity = 90%, specificity = 81%, AUROC = 0.91; No significant differences between scores (P > 0.05) |
Ulcerating disease; Ileo-colonoscopy: Presence of ulceration | MaRIA ≥ 11: Sensitivity = 95%, specificity = 91%, AUROC = 0.97; sMaRIA ≥ 2: Sensitivity = 85%, specificity = 82%, AUROC = 0.94; No significant differences between scores (P > 0.05) | |||
Kumar et al[78] | sMaRIA; London score; CDMI | 111 | Active disease-HAI cutoff > 0; Biopsy of terminal ileum on ileo-colonoscopy | sMaRIA ≥ 1: Sensitivity= 83%, specificity = 41%; London score ≥ 4.1: Sensitivity = 76%, specificity = 64%; CDMI ≥ 3: Sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 41%; No P value provided |
Active disease-HAI cutoff > 1; Biopsy of terminal ileum on ileo-colonoscopy | sMaRIA ≥ 1: Sensitivity = 90%, specificity: 31%; London score ≥ 4.1: Sensitivity = 86%, specificity: 46%; CDMI ≥ 3: Sensitivity = 88%, specificity = 33%; No P value provided | |||
Lee et al[53] | MaRIA; sMaRIA; Nancy score | 61 | Active disease; Ileo-colonoscopy: SES-CD ≥ 2 | MaRIA ≥ 8.46: Sensitivity = 63.3%, specificity = 87.6%, AUROC = 0.752; sMaRIA ≥ 1: Sensitivity = 64.2%, specificity = 85.0%, AUROC = 0.764; Nancy > 1: Sensitivity = 65.1%, specificity = 83.8%, AUROC = 0.765; No significant differences between scores (all P > 0.05) |
Sub-analysis: Crohn’s disease diagnosis; Active vs inactive disease; Ileo-colonoscopy: SES-CD ≥ 2 vs < 2 | MaRIA ≥ 8.46: AUROC = 0.826; sMaRIA ≥ 1: AUROC = 0.802; Nancy > 1: AUROC = 0.847; All scores able to differentiate (all P < 0.05) | |||
Sub-analysis: Disease monitoring; Active vs inactive disease; Ileo-colonoscopy: SES-CD ≥ 2 vs < 2 | MaRIA ≥ 8.46: AUROC = 0.721; sMaRIA ≥ 1: AUROC = 0.741; Nancy > 1: AUROC = 0.652; MaRIA/sMaRIA able (both, P < 0.05) vs Nancy unable (P > 0.05) to differentiate | |||
Sub-analysis: Flare up or complication assessment; Active and inactive disease differentiation; Ileo-colonoscopy: SES-CD ≥ 2 | MaRIA ≥ 8.46: AUROC = 0.761; sMaRIA ≥ 1: AUROC = 0.761; Nancy > 1: AUROC = 0.754; All scores able to differentiate (all P < 0.05) | |||
Bohra et al[79] | MaRIA; sMaRIA; London score; CDMI | 137 | Active vs inactive disease on high quality MRE; Ileo-colonoscopy: SES-CD ≥ 3 | MaRIA ≥ 7: AUROC= 0.838; sMaRIA ≥ 1: AUROC = 0.834; London score ≥ 4.1: AUROC = 0.738; CDMI ≥ 3: AUROC = 0.850; No P value provided |
Active vs inactive disease on low quality MRE; Ileo-colonoscopy: SES-CD ≥ 3 | MaRIA ≥ 7: AUROC= 0.634; sMaRIA ≥ 1: AUROC = 0.527; London score ≥ 4.1: AUROC = 0.511; CDMI ≥ 3: AUROC = 0.595; No P value provided; Diagnostic performances reduced on low vs high quality MRE (all P < 0.05) |
- Citation: Lo RW, Bhatnagar G, Kutaiba N, Srinivasan AR. Evaluating luminal and post-operative Crohn’s disease activity on magnetic resonance enterography: A review of radiological disease activity scores. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(26): 107419
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i26/107419.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i26.107419