Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2025; 31(23): 107100
Published online Jun 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i23.107100
Published online Jun 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i23.107100
Table 4 Clinical comparison of individuals with and without cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma in systemic therapy
Cirrhotic | Non-cirrhotic | |
Liver function | Impaired (Child-Pugh A, B, C) | Preserved |
Therapeutic flexibility | Limited | Higher freedom for the TKI and IO combination |
Toxicity risk | High (decompensation, bleeding, and encephalopathy) | Low (better tolerance) |
Clinical trial inclusion | Most Child-Pugh A (B or C are typically excluded) | No well-classified |
TKI use | Reduced dose in Child-Pugh B, and avoided in Child-Pugh C | Full dose (according to guidelines) |
IO | Can be used in Child-Pugh A, but has uncertain use in Child-Pugh B or C | Well tolerated (first-line treatment) |
Treatment goals | Controlling the tumor while maintaining liver function | Aggressive tumor control; Potential cure |
Liver transplant eligibility | Yes, it is within the criteria (e.g., Milan criteria) | Usually not applicable |
Prognosis | Hepatic functional reserve is more critical than tumor stage | Determined by tumor size and stage |
- Citation: Sato-Espinoza K, Valdivia-Herrera M, Chotiprasidhi P, Diaz-Ferrer J. Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients without cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(23): 107100
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i23/107100.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i23.107100