Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2025; 31(23): 107100
Published online Jun 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i23.107100
Table 4 Clinical comparison of individuals with and without cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma in systemic therapy

Cirrhotic
Non-cirrhotic
Liver functionImpaired (Child-Pugh A, B, C)Preserved
Therapeutic flexibilityLimitedHigher freedom for the TKI and IO combination
Toxicity riskHigh (decompensation, bleeding, and encephalopathy)Low (better tolerance)
Clinical trial inclusionMost Child-Pugh A (B or C are typically excluded)No well-classified
TKI useReduced dose in Child-Pugh B, and avoided in Child-Pugh CFull dose (according to guidelines)
IOCan be used in Child-Pugh A, but has uncertain use in Child-Pugh B or CWell tolerated (first-line treatment)
Treatment goalsControlling the tumor while maintaining liver functionAggressive tumor control; Potential cure
Liver transplant eligibilityYes, it is within the criteria (e.g., Milan criteria)Usually not applicable
PrognosisHepatic functional reserve is more critical than tumor stageDetermined by tumor size and stage