BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2025; 31(23): 107100
Published online Jun 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i23.107100
Table 4 Clinical comparison of individuals with and without cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma in systemic therapy

Cirrhotic
Non-cirrhotic
Liver functionImpaired (Child-Pugh A, B, C)Preserved
Therapeutic flexibilityLimitedHigher freedom for the TKI and IO combination
Toxicity riskHigh (decompensation, bleeding, and encephalopathy)Low (better tolerance)
Clinical trial inclusionMost Child-Pugh A (B or C are typically excluded)No well-classified
TKI useReduced dose in Child-Pugh B, and avoided in Child-Pugh CFull dose (according to guidelines)
IOCan be used in Child-Pugh A, but has uncertain use in Child-Pugh B or CWell tolerated (first-line treatment)
Treatment goalsControlling the tumor while maintaining liver functionAggressive tumor control; Potential cure
Liver transplant eligibilityYes, it is within the criteria (e.g., Milan criteria)Usually not applicable
PrognosisHepatic functional reserve is more critical than tumor stageDetermined by tumor size and stage


Write to the Help Desk