Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2025; 31(23): 107100
Published online Jun 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i23.107100
Table 3 Summary of the scores and stage systems in individuals with non-cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma

Controversies
Limitations
Research hotspots
Scores and stage systems
BCLCNew update in 2022, introducing more flexibility and personalized treatment decisions with no strictly stage-based approach could be advantageous for individuals without cirrhosisPrimarily focus on individuals with underlying chronic liver disease, especially with cirrhosis. Not validated in non-cirrhotic individualsStudies validated the BCLC stage systems in non-cirrhotic individuals with HCC, which evaluate treatment options, long-term outcomes, and explicitly stratified categories for those individuals are needed
Child-PughThe use of ascites and encephalopathy may be underestimated due to the common presentation of preserved liver functions observed in individuals without cirrhosisDesigned to evaluate the severity and prognosis in individuals with cirrhosis. Not validated in non-cirrhotic individualsStudies that validate the Child-Pugh score in individuals with HCC without cirrhosis are needed; Creating a new score potentially without ascites and encephalopathy is needed to compare if the individuals are being underestimated
TNMIt is a valuable staging system for anatomical tumor burden, but is not sufficient alone for accurate HCC treatment guidance or outcomesFocus on anatomical staging; Best for post-operative prognosisStudies redefining TNM, evaluating treatment responses, and long-term outcomes are needed
HKLCProposed more aggressive treatments with more curative therapy but with potential risk of over-treatmentDeveloped based on a population predominantly with hepatitis B; Not well validated with other etiologiesStudies validating the stage system in diverse populations with different background etiologies are needed; Studies evaluating treatment options and long-term outcomes are needed
LI-RADSOnly individuals with hepatitis B or cirrhosis benefit from this, but individuals outside these criteria may be leading to a missed diagnosis. No consensus on biopsy, follow-up time, or surveillance in intermediate categoriesDesigned for individuals with cirrhosis or with HCC-associated hepatitis B; Not well validated with other etiologiesStudies validating the diagnosis in populations with different background etiologies are needed; Studies integrating LI-RADS with biomarkers to improve early HCC detection are needed