Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2025; 31(23): 107100
Published online Jun 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i23.107100
Published online Jun 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i23.107100
Table 3 Summary of the scores and stage systems in individuals with non-cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma
Controversies | Limitations | Research hotspots | |
Scores and stage systems | |||
BCLC | New update in 2022, introducing more flexibility and personalized treatment decisions with no strictly stage-based approach could be advantageous for individuals without cirrhosis | Primarily focus on individuals with underlying chronic liver disease, especially with cirrhosis. Not validated in non-cirrhotic individuals | Studies validated the BCLC stage systems in non-cirrhotic individuals with HCC, which evaluate treatment options, long-term outcomes, and explicitly stratified categories for those individuals are needed |
Child-Pugh | The use of ascites and encephalopathy may be underestimated due to the common presentation of preserved liver functions observed in individuals without cirrhosis | Designed to evaluate the severity and prognosis in individuals with cirrhosis. Not validated in non-cirrhotic individuals | Studies that validate the Child-Pugh score in individuals with HCC without cirrhosis are needed; Creating a new score potentially without ascites and encephalopathy is needed to compare if the individuals are being underestimated |
TNM | It is a valuable staging system for anatomical tumor burden, but is not sufficient alone for accurate HCC treatment guidance or outcomes | Focus on anatomical staging; Best for post-operative prognosis | Studies redefining TNM, evaluating treatment responses, and long-term outcomes are needed |
HKLC | Proposed more aggressive treatments with more curative therapy but with potential risk of over-treatment | Developed based on a population predominantly with hepatitis B; Not well validated with other etiologies | Studies validating the stage system in diverse populations with different background etiologies are needed; Studies evaluating treatment options and long-term outcomes are needed |
LI-RADS | Only individuals with hepatitis B or cirrhosis benefit from this, but individuals outside these criteria may be leading to a missed diagnosis. No consensus on biopsy, follow-up time, or surveillance in intermediate categories | Designed for individuals with cirrhosis or with HCC-associated hepatitis B; Not well validated with other etiologies | Studies validating the diagnosis in populations with different background etiologies are needed; Studies integrating LI-RADS with biomarkers to improve early HCC detection are needed |
- Citation: Sato-Espinoza K, Valdivia-Herrera M, Chotiprasidhi P, Diaz-Ferrer J. Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients without cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(23): 107100
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i23/107100.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i23.107100