Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2025; 31(23): 106949
Published online Jun 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i23.106949
Figure 5
Figure 5 The effect of celastrol in preventing esophageal stricture in vivo. A: Rats were divided into the following five groups: Sham group, vehicle group, celastrol (CEL) group, prednisolone (PRED) group, and CEL plus PRED group. Inflammation was assessed on day 6, and fibrosis was evaluated on day 9; B: Representative barium esophagography image of esophageal stricture on day 9 in rats; C: Body weight (g) of rats (n = 5 in each group) (presented as mean ± SE). Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test for Day 1 and Day 3 and one-way ANOVA test for Day 5, Day 7, and Day 9, with the “vehicle” group as the control. Only statistically significant comparisons are marked in corresponding colors. aP < 0.001; bP = 0.005; cP = 0.01; dP = 0.01; eP = 0.01; fP = 0.004; gP = 0.02; hP = 0.01; iP = 0.005; jP = 0.002; kP = 0.004; LP = 0.001; NLRP3: NLR family pyrin domain containing 3; CEL: Celastrol; PRED: Prednisolone; LPS: Lipopolysaccharide.