Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 7, 2025; 31(21): 107029
Published online Jun 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i21.107029
Published online Jun 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i21.107029
Figure 2 Box plots of the log odds of positive lymph nodes according to clinical features.
A: Age; B: Pathological type; C: Differentiation; D: Body mass index; E: Nerve invasion; F: Vascular tumor thrombus; G: Recurrence or metastasis; H: Pathological tumor-node-metastasis. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01; cP < 0.005; dP < 0.001. LODDS: Log odds of positive lymph nodes; pTNM: Pathological tumor-node-metastasis; MGC: Mucinous gastric adenocarcinoma; NMGC: Non-mucinous gastric adenocarcinoma; BMI: Body mass index; ns: Not significant.
- Citation: Deng MC, Chen K, Bao QM, Huang YX, Zhang CK, Zhong YK, He HY, Zu D, Liang C, Liu HD, Hu YC, Liu GX, He YH, Wu WX, Zhou JN, Teng YS, Jing J, Shi Y, Chung CYS, Yu CH, Du YA, Ye Z, Cheng XD. Evaluating log odds of positive lymph nodes as a prognostic tool in differentiated gastric cancer: A retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(21): 107029
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i21/107029.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i21.107029