Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2023; 29(23): 3574-3594
Published online Jun 21, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i23.3574
Table 6 Summary of clinical trial results of epigenetic regulators
Study
Targeted disease
No. of patients
Objective response rate
Complete response rate
Progression-free survival
Overall survival
Adverse events or others
Ref.
Tazemetostat alone, phase-IIr/r FL, EZH2-mut; FL, EZH2-wt. FLn = 99, mut FL n = 45; wt FL n = 5469% (EZH2 mut); 35% (EZH2 wt)Unknown; unknownMedian PFS: 13.8 mo (EZH2 mut); 13.1 mo (EZH2 wt) UnknownG3 or higher 27%+, treatment discontinued at 8%[54]
Tazemetostat (first EZH2 inhibitor) vs inderalisib, duvelisib, copanlishib, umbralisibr/r FL, systematic literature reviewTazemetostat vs inderalisib 43% vs 56; duvelisib 48% vs 47; Kopanlisib 49% vs 61; umbralisib 57% vs 47; no significant difference in either caseUnknown Unknown Unknown Predominantly reduced risk of adverse events compared to PI3Ki[57]
Vorinostat (HDACi), phase-IIr/r Inhl + MCL, median with one or more prior treatmentn = 39 (r/r FL)49%Unknown Median PFS, 20 moUnknownG3 or higher 8%[58]
Vorinostat + rituximab, phase-IIUntreated and r/r FL (4 or less prior treatment)n = 2246% (all patients); 67% (untreated pts); 41% (r/r FL)UnknownMedian PFS, 29.2 mo (all patients); not reached (untreated pts); 18.8 mo (r/r FL)Unknown[59]
Mocetinostat, phase-IIr/r DLBCL, r/r FLn = 41, n = 3118.9% (r/r DLBCL), 11.5% (r/r FL)Unknown1.8-22.8 mo (DLBCL); 11.8-26.3 mo (FL)UnknownFatigue (75.0%); nausea (69.4%); diarrhea (61.1%)[60]