Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm

doi:10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 28, Issue 45

This Article

(217)

(197)

(0)

(15)

(6569)

(12)

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

- Full Article with Cover (PDF)
- Full Article (XML)

Randomized Clinical Trial

World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2022; 28(45): 6397-6409
Published online Dec 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population

Characteristic	EMR-P (n = 110), %	CEMR (n = 110), %	P value
Male (%)	67 (60.9)	70 (63.6)	0.676
Mean age (yr, ± SD)	60.4 ± 10.4	59.9 ± 11.5	0.735
Height (cm)	164.4 ± 7.7	165.0 ± 7.5	0.566
Weight (kg)	61.4 ± 10.5	63.5 ± 10.7	0.151
Location, n (%)			0.725
Cecum	6 (5.5)	5 (4.5)
Ascending	19 (17.3)	18 (16.4)
Transverse	24 (21.8)	28 (25.5)
Descending	7 (6.4)	9 (8.2)
Sigmoid	26 (23.6)	31 (28.2)
Rectum	28 (25.5)	19 (17.3)
Morphology, n (%)			0.858
0-Ip	3 (2.7)	3 (2.7)
0-Is	36 (32.7)	42 (38.2)
0-IIa	68 (61.8)	62 (56.4)
0-IIb	2 (1.8)	3 (2.7)
0-IIc	1 (0.9)	0 (0.0)
Institution, n (%)			0.570
A	16 (14.5)	9 (8.2)
B	31 (28.2)	28 (25.5)
C	6 (5.5)	5 (4.5)
D	19 (17.3)	16 (14.5)
E	9 (8.2)	14 (12.7)
F	13 (11.8)	18 (16.4)
G	16 (14.5)	20 (18.2)
Tumor size (mm)	14.0 ± 3.7	13.1 ± 3.1	0.055
Operator experience, n (%)			0.072
Experienced endoscopist	109 (99.1)	103 (93.6)
Non-experienced endoscopist	1 (0.9)	7 (6.4)

Institution A: The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China; Institution B: Renmin Hospital of Yuyao City, Zhejiang, China; Institution C: Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Zhejiang, China; Institution D: Taizhou Hospital, Zhejiang, China; Institution E: The Central Hospital of Lishui City, Zhejiang, China; Institution F: Ningbo Medical Center, Lihuili Hospital, Zhejiang, China; Institution G: Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China. EMR-P: Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential precutting; CEMR: Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection.

Full Size Table

Citation: Zhang XQ, Sang JZ, Xu L, Mao XL, Li B, Zhu WL, Yang XY, Yu CH. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(45): 6397-6409
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i45/6397.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397

Zhang XQ, Sang JZ, Xu L, Mao XL, Li B, Zhu WL, Yang XY, Yu CH. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(45): 6397-6409 [PMID: 36533110 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.