Online calculator for predicting the risk of malignancy in patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasms: A multicenter, retrospective study

doi:10.3748/wjg.v28.i37.5469

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 28, Issue 37

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (2993)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-6) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

155

WORD

HTML

1414

Figures (1-6)

285

Tables (1-3)

253

Sum=2155

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

272

Download

566

Sum=838

Oct 7, 2022 (publication date) through Apr 24, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (3)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2022; 28(37): 5469-5482
Published online Oct 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i37.5469

Table 3 Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses of the risk factors for high risk of malignancy in patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasms

Variable	OR comparisons	Univariable analysis		Multivariable analysis
Variable	OR comparisons	OR (95%CI)	P value	OR (95%CI)	P value
Sex	Female vs Male	2.383 (1.054-5.386)	0.037^a	0.716 (0.232-2.213)	0.562
Age in yr	≥ 60 vs < 60	2.180 (0.967-4.915)	0.060
BMI		0.986 (0.874-1.111)	0.816
Weight loss	Yes vs No	2.437 (0.861-6.897)	0.093
Alcohol	Yes vs No	2.252 (0.741-6.845)	0.153
Symptomatic	Yes vs No	1.774 (0.737-4.271)	0.201
Tumor involve the head of pancreas	Yes vs No	1.148 (0.487-2.705)	0.753
Bile duct dilation	Yes vs No	1.788 (0.460-6.952)	0.402
Tumor diameter in mm	≥ 40 vs < 40	4.094 (1.649-10.165)	0.002^a	3.514 (1.138-10.849)	0.029^a
Intratumoral septum	Yes vs No	0.539 (0.240-1.211)	0.135
Cyst wall enhancement	Yes vs No	1.127 (0.494-2.569)	0.777
Cyst wall thickening	Yes vs No	1.670 (0.329-8.488)	0.536
Enhanced mural nodules	Yes vs No	6.490 (2.746-15.342)	< 0.001^a	4.314 (1.618-11.503)	0.003^a
Intracapsular calcification	Yes vs No	0.208 (0.027-1.606)	0.132
Main pancreatic duct dilatation	Yes vs No	3.574 (1.558-8.201)	0.003^a	3.267 (1.230-8.678)	0.018^a
NLR	≥ 2.288 vs < 2.288	3.077 (1.350-7.015)	0.008^a	2.702 (1.008-7.244)	0.048^a
TB in μmol/L	≥ 34.2 vs < 34.2	6.240 (1.192-32.657)	0.030^a	0.870 (0.050-15.020)	0.924
ALP in IU/L	≥ 200 vs < 200	9.420 (1.499-59.213)	0.017^a	0.632 (0.064-6.285)	0.695
GGT in IU/L	≥ 150 vs < 150	2.925 (0.931-9.189)	0.066
CEA in ng/mL	≥ 5 vs < 5	6.955 (2.060-23.477)	0.002^a	3.798 (0.825-17.482)	0.087
CA199 in U/mL	≥ 34 vs < 34	4.547 (1.750-11.816)	0.002^a	3.267 (1.274-13.007)	0.018^a

^aP < 0.05.

ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; BMI: Body mass index; CA19-9: Carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen; CI: Confidence interval; GGT: γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; NLR: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte; OR: Odds ratio; TB: Total bilirubin.

Citation: Jiang D, Chen ZX, Ma FX, Gong YY, Pu T, Chen JM, Liu XQ, Zhao YJ, Xie K, Hou H, Wang C, Geng XP, Liu FB. Online calculator for predicting the risk of malignancy in patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasms: A multicenter, retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(37): 5469-5482
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i37/5469.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i37.5469