Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2021; 27(22): 3050-3063
Published online Jun 14, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i22.3050
Table 3 Published studies using several options for minimal hepatic encephalopathy treatment: Diet, branched-chain amino acids or L-ornithine-L-aspartate supplementation, and probiotics/symbiotics
Ref.
Study type
Follow-up (wk)
MHE diagnosis
Active treatment (s)
Objectives
Patients (n)
Main results/impact measures
No history of OHE1
Kato et al[37], 2012Quasi-experimental8NCT-A, NCT-B, BDT, DST30-35 Kcal + 1.0-1.5 g/kg of protein/d3,4Reversal of MHE1911/19 (57.8%) recovered at 4 wk, and 13/19 (68.4%) at 8 wk8
Maharshi et al[33], 2016Randomized224NCT-A/FCT-A, NCT-B/FCT-B, DST, LTT, SDTNutritional education/no nutritional therapy3,5Reversal of MHE60/6027/38 (71.1%) vs 8/35 (22.8%); 27/60 (45%) vs 8/60 (13.3%), when considering PPS and ITT analysis.
Malaguarnera et al[64], 2008Randomized, double-blind13NCT-A, NCT-B, BDT, SDT, TMT, AVL, EGGAcetyl-L-carnitine /placebo5Cognitive scores760/55Changes of mean values in at least 20.71% to 32.79% respect to basal values8
Bajaj et al[34], 2014Randomized, double-blind8NCT-A, NCT-B, DST/BDTLGG/placeboPsychometric scores718/19Improvement from 1.02% to 15.89% from baseline values
Bajaj et al[44], 2008Randomized28NCT-A, BDT, DSTProbiotic yogurt/no treatment4,5Reversal of MHE17/8ITT analysis: Reversal in 12/17 (70.58%) vs 0/7 (0%)
Mittal et al[39], 2011Randomized212NCT-A/FCT-A, NCT-B/FCT-B, BDT, PCLactulose/VSL#3, LOLA/no treatmentReversal of MHE40/40/40/40ITT analysis: Reversal of 4 (10%) in no treatment group, 19 (47.5%), 14 (35%) and 14 (35%)
Possible history of OHE1
Egberts et al[35], 1985Crossover, double blind6EGG, DST, MVT-BBCAAs/placeboPsychometry and EGG11/11Improvement in psychometric test from 0 to 13.63% respect to basal values in DST8
Ndraha et al[36], 2011Double blind, randomized2CFFBCAAs + LOLA/BCAAs4CFF17/17Improvement in CFF 7.0% and 1.96% values (Hz), respect to baseline
Kircheis et al[41], 1997Randomized, double-blind1NCT-ALOLA infusion vs Placebo5Psychometry726/27Improvement in mean time to respond NCT-A from baseline (29% vs 9.73%)
Liu et al[29], 2004Randomized24NCT, BAEPSymbiotics + fermentable fibers/fermentable fibers/placebo4,5Reversal of MHE720/20/15Reversal of 50% in symbiotic group, 50% in fermentable fibers group and 13% in placebo. Not statistically significant until compression of treatment groups vs placebo (P = 0.03)9
Dhiman et al[65], 2014Double blind, randomized24NCT-A/FCT-A, NCT-B, SDT, DST, LTTVSL#3/placeboPsychometric scores716/13Mean psychometric scores before and after probiotics -9.9 (-13.3- to -6.5) vs -5.7 (-8.4 to 2.9) P = 0.014. Proportion of patients with scores < -5 did not change in either group10
Malaguarnera et al[45], 2007Randomized, double-blind17TMT-A, TMT-B, BDT, MMSEBifidobacterium longum + FOS/placebo5Psychometry30/30No statistical or clinical change was found respect to basal values at, 30, 60, 90 and 120 d
Ziada et al[48], 2013Randomized24NCT-A, DST, SDTLactulose/L, acidophilus/control5,6Psychometry24/26/25Normalization of test occurred in 13/24 (54.2%), 14/26 (53.8%), and 3/25 (12%)