Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2021; 27(11): 1043-1054
Published online Mar 21, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i11.1043
Table 3 Comparison of clinical outcomes between Okayama University Hospital and other hospitals
Institution (patients/lesions)
OUH (17/20)
Other hospitals (21/28)
P value
Median age, yr (range)70 (57-83)73 (58-84)0.28
Male, n (%)15 (88)19 (79)0.72
Reconstruction route of gastric tube, n< 0.01
Antethoracic70
Retrosternal74
Posterior mediastinal317
Median tumor size, mm (range)18 (8-60)15 (4-40)0.21
depth, M/SM, n16/424/40.6
Ulcerative findings positive, n (%)3 (15)4 (14)0.94
Median procedure time, min (range)50 (20-180)108 (32-334)< 0.01
En bloc resection, n (%)19 (95)25 (89)0.48
Curative resection (eCura A or B), n (%)17 (85)21 (75)0.4
Adverse events during ESD, n (%)1 (5.0)1 (3.6)0.8
Adverse events post ESD, n (%)3 (15)2 (7.1)0.37