Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2020; 26(9): 973-983
Published online Mar 7, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i9.973
Published online Mar 7, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i9.973
Table 1 Baseline characteristics and comparison of procedurerelated parameters
| Characteristics | Mark-guided POEM (n = 64) | Standard POEM (n = 69) | P value |
| Sex | |||
| Male (n) | 33 (51.6%) | 36 (52.2%) | 0.94 |
| Female (n) | 31 (48.4%) | 33 (47.8%) | |
| Age (yr) | 33.5 (28-48.75) | 40 (30-47.75) | 0.22 |
| Achalasia Type | |||
| I | 21 (32.8%) | 23 (33.3%) | 0.98 |
| II | 36 (56.3%) | 38 (55.1%) | |
| III | 7 (10.9%) | 8 (11.6%) | |
| Disease duration (mo) | 32.5 (23-49.50) | 33 (22.5-49.50) | 0.95 |
| Eckardt score | 9.0 (8-9.75) | 8.0 (7-9) | 0.32 |
| Barium esophagraphy | |||
| Height (cm) | 8 (8-9) | 8 (7-9) | 0.55 |
| Diameter (cm) | 5 (4-6) | 5 (5-6) | 0.29 |
| HRM (mmHg) | 38 (28-41) | 38 (28-41.5) | 0.64 |
| GERDQ score | 7 (6-9) | 7 (6-8.5) | 0.74 |
| SF-36 score | 47.22 ± 7.25 | 46.81 ± 7.60 | 0.75 |
| Procedure duration (min) | 40 (38-43) | 49 (47-51) | < 0.001 |
| Technical success (n) | 64 (100%) | 69 (100%) | 1 |
| Postoperative stay (d) | 1 (1-2) | 1 (1-2) | 0.56 |
| Perforation (n) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Bleeding (n) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
- Citation: Li DF, Xiong F, Yu ZC, Zhang HY, Liu TT, Tian YH, Shi RY, Lai MG, Song Y, Xu ZL, Zhang DG, Yao J, Wang LS. Effect and safety of mark-guided vs standard peroral endoscopic myotomy: A retrospective case control study. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(9): 973-983
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i9/973.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i9.973