Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2020; 26(42): 6614-6625
Published online Nov 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i42.6614
Table 1 Results of traditional nummular magnetic compression anastomosis devices with different sizes

Group 1.1
Group 1.2
Group 1.3
Group 1.4
P value
Survival rate93.3% (14/15)100% (15/15)73.3% (11/15)73.3 (11/15)0.083
Discharge time (d)3 (IQR 3-4)3 (IQR 3-4)2 (IQR 1-4)2.5 (IQR 2-3)0.002
Adhesion score
092.9% (13/14)86.7% (13/15)27.3% (3/11)27.3% (3/11)< 0.001
17.1% (1/14)13.3% (2/15)27.3% (3/11)9.1 (1/11)
20 (0/14)0 (0/15)9.1% (1/11)27.3% (3/11)
30 (0/14)0 (0/15)18.2% (2/11)18.2% (2/11)
40 (0/14)0 (0/15)18.2% (2/11)18.2% (2/11)
Circumference of anastomotic stomas (mm)
30 d2.47 ± 0.188.84 ± 0.3113.54 ± 0.3115.98 ± 0.73< 0.001
90 d1.20 ± 0.185.90 ± 0.2713.73 ± 0.4916.43 ± 0.30< 0.001
180 d0.35 ± 0.192.07 ± 0.3713.24 ± 0.6816.33 ± 0.37< 0.001
Bursting pressure (mmHg)
30 d247.64 ± 10.78245.18 ± 7.77242.90 ± 11.56205.725 ± 8.060.032
90 d264.55 ± 7.87269.46 ± 9.30261.47 ± 9.72256.03 ± 15.630.830
180 d263.32 ± 10.85258.62 ± 10.19261.08 ± 12.06265.05 ± 11.260.978