Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2020; 26(41): 6475-6487
Published online Nov 7, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i41.6475
Table 4 Baseline characteristics of the third-look endoscopy and control group after propensity score matching

TLE (n = 58)
Control (n = 58)
P value
Age, mean ± SD (yr)75.8 ± 6.4 77.7 ± 6.5 0.10
Sex0.59
Male, % (n)84.5 (49)87.9 (51)
Female, % (n)15.5 (9)12.1 (7)
Location-10.52
Upper, % (n)19.0 (11)13.8 (8)
Middle, % (n)6.9 (4)12.1 (7)
Lower, % (n)74.1 (43)74.1 (43)
Location-20.14
Anterior wall, % (n)12.1 (7)24.1 (14)
Posterior wall, % (n)34.5 (20)19.0 (11)
Lesser curvature, % (n)34.5 (20)41.4 (24)
Greater curvature, % (n)19.0 (11)15.5 (9)
Morphology0.35
Protruded, % (n)46.6 (27)55.2 (32)
Flat/depressed, % (n)53.5 (31)44.8 (26)
Median tumor size (range)9.5 (2-40)11.0 (3-43)0.54
Median specimen size (range)34 (18-60)33 (17-78)0.71
Ulcerative findings1.00
(+), % (n)1.7 (1)1.7 (1)
(-), % (n)98.3 (57)98.3 (57)
Depth of invasion0.17
M/SM1, % (n)98.3 (57)93.1 (54)
SM2-, % (n)1.7 (1)6.9 (4)
Pathological finding-
Differentiated type, % (n)100 (58)100 (58)
Undifferentiated type, % (n)0 (0)0 (0)
Lymphovascular infiltration 1.00
(+), % (n)3.5 (2)3.5 (2)
(-), % (n)96.6 (56)96.6 (56)
Median procedure time (range)36.0 (10-78)37.0 (8-175)0.14
Receiving antithrombotic agents-
Continue, % (n)100 (58)100 (58)
Discontinue, % (n)0 (0)0 (0)