©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2020; 26(39): 6027-6036
Published online Oct 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i39.6027
Published online Oct 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i39.6027
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 245 patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer who received at least one line of systemic therapy
| Only one line of therapy (n = 122) | At least two lines of therapy (n = 123) | P value | |
| Median age (IQR) | 68 (61.7-73.7) | 62 (56.1-70.6) | < 0.05 |
| Gender, n (%) | 0.37 | ||
| Male | 96 (79) | 90 (73) | |
| Female | 26 (21) | 33 (27) | |
| Ethnicity, n (%) | 0.59 | ||
| Caucasian | 101 (83) | 95 (77) | |
| Asian | 15 (12) | 21 (17) | |
| East Asian | 6 (5) | 6 (5) | |
| Other | 0 | 1 (1) | |
| Histology, n (%) | 0.92 | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | 96 (79) | 95 (77) | |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 9 (7) | 11 (9) | |
| Signet ring cell | 17 (14) | 17 (14) | |
| HER2 status, n (%) | 0.41 | ||
| Positive | 27 (22) | 37 (30) | |
| Negative | 70 (57) | 72 (59) | |
| Unknown | 25 (20) | 14 (11) | |
| MMR status by IHC, n (%) | 1.0 | ||
| Deficient MMR | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | |
| Proficient MMR | 34 (28) | 55 (45) | |
| Unknown | 87 (71) | 67 (54) | |
| Grade, n (%) | 0.14 | ||
| Well | 3 (2) | 5 (4) | |
| Moderate | 30 (25) | 42 (34) | |
| Poor | 58 (48) | 45 (37) | |
| Unknown | 31 (25) | 31 (25) | |
| Site of primary, n (%) | 0.44 | ||
| Gastric | 44 (36) | 46 (37) | |
| GEJ/esophagus | 78 (64) | 77 (63) | |
| Location of metastases, n (%) | |||
| Lymph node | 64 (52) | 54 (44) | 0.20 |
| Lung | 29 (24) | 28 (67) | 0.88 |
| Liver | 39 (32) | 50 (41) | 0.18 |
| Peritoneum | 31 (25) | 23 (19) | 0.22 |
| Other | 28 (23) | 16 (13) | 0.05 |
| Disease presentation, n (%) | 0.89 | ||
| De novo disease | 87 (71) | 89 (72) | |
| Recurrent disease | 35 (29) | 34 (28) | |
| Previous chemoradiation, n (%) | 32 (26) | 29 (24) | 0.66 |
| Previous resection, n (%) | 27 (22) | 24 (20) | 0.64 |
| ECOG at baseline, n (%) | 0.14 | ||
| 0 | 11 (9) | 20 (16) | |
| 1 | 83 (68) | 84 (68) | |
| 2 | 28 (23) | 19 (15) | |
| Best response to first-line treatment, n (%) | < 0.05 | ||
| Complete response | 6 (5) | 4 (3) | |
| Partial response | 33 (27) | 46 (37) | |
| Stable disease | 20 (16) | 38 (31) | |
| Progressive disease | 58 (48) | 33 (27) | |
| Unknown | 5 (4) | 2 (2) | |
| Median duration of first-line treatment | 2.7 (0.9-6.1) | 5.00 (3.5-9.8) | < 0.05 |
| Reason for discontinuation of first-line treatment, n (%) | 0.02 | ||
| Progression | 82 (67) | 101 (82) | |
| Toxicity | 15 (12) | 4 (3) | |
| Other | 23 (19) | 17 (14) | |
| Unknown | 2 (2) | 1 (1) |
- Citation: Tsang ES, Lim HJ, Renouf DJ, Davies JM, Loree JM, Gill S. Real-world treatment attrition rates in advanced esophagogastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(39): 6027-6036
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i39/6027.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i39.6027