Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2020; 26(3): 307-323
Published online Jan 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i3.307
Table 6 Association between nucleotide excision repair polymorphisms and colorectal cancer prognosis
SNP genotypeCRC patientsDeathMST (M)Univariate
Multivariate
P valueHR (95%CI)P valueHR (95%CI)
DDB2
rs2029298n = 560n = 94
GG2625044.411(Ref)1 (Ref)
GA2303547.410.3680.82 (0.53-1.26)0.3930.82 (0.53-1.29)
AA68948.610.2650.67 (0.33-1.36)0.4670.77 (0.37-1.57)
GA + AA vs GG0.2350.78 (0.52-1.17)0.3070.81 (0.53-1.22)
AA vs GA + GG0.3700.73 (0.37-1.45)0.5810.82 (0.41-1.65)
ERCC1
rs11615n = 561n = 95
CC3456246.411 (Ref)1 (Ref)
CT1882947.210.6470.90 (0.58-1.40)0.9471.02 (0.65-1.59)
TT28445.810.9550.97 (0.35-2.67)0.9750.98 (0.35-2.76)
CT + TT vs CC0.6620.91 (0.60-1.39)0.9740.99 (0.65-1.53)
TT vs CT + CC0.9991.00 (0.37-2.73)0.9110.94 (0.34-2.60)
rs735482n = 552n = 91
CC1232346.811 (Ref)1 (Ref)
CA2583847.310.9820.99 (0.59-1.67)0.5821.16 (0.69-1.96)
AA1713045.510.6031.16 (0.67-1.99)0.7740.92 (0.53-1.61)
CA + AA vs CC0.8291.05 (0.66-1.69)0.9231.02 (0.64-1.65)
AA vs CA + CC0.5171.16 (0.75-1.79)0.5210.86 (0.55-1.35)
ERCC2
rs1052555n = 563n = 95
CC5068646.611 (Ref)1 (Ref)
CT56848.310.3770.72 (0.35-1.49)0.9981.00 (0.48-2.09)
TT112< 0.00149.73 (6.37-388.47)0.01014.99 (1.90-118.10)
CT + TT vs CC0.5510.81 (0.41-1.61)0.7441.12 (0.56-2.26)
TT vs CT + CC< 0.00155.22 (7.07-431.35)0.00915.89 (2.02-125.16)
rs50871n = 551n = 92
TT2944347.011 (Ref)1 (Ref)
TG2104045.710.2561.28 (0.83-1.98)0.4461.19 (0.77-1.84)
GG47945.810.5411.25 (0.61-2.57)0.5760.80 (0.37-1.74)
TG + GG vs TT0.2391.28 (0.85-1.93)0.6461.10 (0.73-1.68)
GG vs TG + TT0.7491.12 (0.56-2.23)0.3540.71 (0.34-1.47)
ERCC5
rs1047768n = 553n = 92
CC55946.711 (Ref)1 (Ref)
CT2334446.510.7851.11 (0.54-2.26)0.9450.97 (0.45-2.09)
TT2653947.010.9331.03 (0.50-2.13)0.5420.78 (0.36-1.72)
CT + TT vs CC0.8511.07 (0.54-2.13)0.7680.90 (0.43-1.87)
TT vs CT + CC0.7990.95 (0.63-1.43)0.3870.83 (0.54-1.27)
rs2094258n = 555n = 93
GG2073846.611 (Ref)1 (Ref)
GA2694247.010.7210.92 (0.60-1.43)0.4000.82 (0.53-1.29)
AA791344.310.9730.99 (0.53-1.86)0.5880.84 (0.44-1.59)
GA + AA vs GG0.7730.94 (0.62-1.42)0.4240.84 (0.55-1.29)
AA vs GA + GG0.8691.05 (0.59-1.89)0.9161.03 (0.57-1.87)
rs2228959n = 558n = 93
CC5018247.111 (Ref)1 (Ref)
CA53945.410.7681.11 (0.56-2.21)0.8110.92 (0.46-1.85)
AA4213.810.0067.18 (1.75-29.50)0.0464.32 (1.03-18.17)
CA + AA vs CC0.4021.31 (0.70-2.46)0.8471.07 (0.56-2.02)
AA vs CA + CC0.0067.16 (1.75-29.32)0.0494.20 (1.00-17.60)
rs2296147n = 556n = 92
TT3184647.411 (Ref)1 (Ref)
TC2074245.410.3841.21 (0.79-1.83)0.1941.32 (0.87-2.02)
CC31448.110.6910.81 (0.29-2.26)0.6581.32 (0.38-4.57)
TC + CC vs TT0.4841.16 (0.77-1.74)0.1841.33 (0.87-2.02)
CC vs TC + TT0.5730.75 (0.28-2.04)0.9781.02 (0.31-3.32)
rs873601n = 558n = 95
GG1402147.511 (Ref)1 (Ref)
GA3014946.910.7451.09 (0.65-1.82)0.9230.98 (0.58-1.64)
AA1172544.510.2931.37 (0.76-2.44)0.7131.12 (0.62-2.03)
GA + AA vs GG0.5261.17 (0.72-1.90)0.9511.02 (0.62-1.66)
AA vs GA + GG0.2751.29 (0.82-2.04)0.4731.19 (0.74-1.90)
XPA
rs10817938n = 545n = 93
TT3516146.611 (Ref)1 (Ref)
TC1632946.210.8151.05 (0.68-1.64)0.4721.18 (0.75-1.88)
CC31349.510.4290.63 (0.20-2.00)0.9030.93 (0.29-3.02)
TC + CC vs TT0.9680.99 (0.65-1.52)0.4891.17 (0.75-1.83)
CC vs TC+TT0.4140.62 (0.20-1.96)0.8630.90 (0.28-2.89)
rs3176629n = 558n = 94
CC4507447.011 (Ref)1 (Ref)
CT1031944.810.4701.20 (0.73-1.99)0.4200.81 (0.48-1.36)
TT5149.310.8240.80 (0.11-5.76)0.6600.64 (0.09-4.64)
CT + TT vs CC0.5211.18 (0.72-1.93)0.3750.79 (0.47-1.33)
TT vs CT + CC0.7870.76 (0.11-5.47)0.6900.67 (0.09-4.82)
XPC
rs2607775n = 556n = 92
CC4948446.811 (Ref)1 (Ref)
CG57846.310.7390.88 (0.43-1.83)0.8420.93 (0.44-1.94)
GG50NA0.525NA0.969NA
CG + GG vs CC0.5550.80 (0.39-1.66)0.6040.82 (0.40-1.72)
GG vs CG + CC0.528NA0.970NA