Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2020; 26(29): 4302-4315
Published online Aug 7, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i29.4302
Table 3 Primary morphological types classified according to the echinococcosis multilocularis Ulm classification for computed tomography, n (%)
XUUB total (n = 200)Xining (n = 50)Urumqi (n = 50)Ulm (n = 50)Besançon (n = 50)
Type I85 (42.5)18 (36.0)17 (34.0)22 (44.0)28 (56.0)
With cystoid portion55 (64.7)13 (72.2)13 (76.5)11 (50.0)18 (64.3)
Without cystoid portion30 (35.3)5 (27.8)4 (23.5)11 (50.0)10 (35.7)
Type II67 (33.5)17 (34.0)26 (52.0)12 (24.0)12 (24.0)
With cystoid portion55 (82.09)13 (76.5)22 (84.6)10 (83.3)10 (83.3)
Without cystoid portion12 (17.9)4 (23.5)4 (15.4)2 (16.7)2 (16.7)
Type III27 (13.5)13 (26.0)7 (14.0)4 (8.0)3 (6.0)
With more solid portions at the edge23 (85.19)11 (84.6)6 (85.7)4 (100.0)2 (66.7)
Without more solid portions at the edge4 (14.8)2 (15.4)1 (14.3)0 (0.0)1 (33.3)
Type iiia8 (4.0)2 (4.0)1 (2.0)2 (4.0)3 (6.0)
With more solid portions at the edge7 (87.5)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)2 (66.7)
Without more solid portions at the edge1 (12.5)2 (100.0)1 (100.0)2 (100.0)1 (33.3)
Type iiib19 (9.5)11 (22.0)6 (12.0)2 (4.0)0 (0.0)
With more solid portions at the edge16 (84.21)9 (81.8)5 (83.3)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Without more solid portions at the edge3 (15.8)2 (18.2)1 (16.7)2 (100.0)0 (0.0)
Type IV17 (8.5)2 (4.0)0 (0.0)9 (18.0)6 (12.0)
Type V4 (2.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)3 (6.0)1 (2.0)