Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2020; 26(11): 1113-1127
Published online Mar 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i11.1113
Table 3 Overview of the major studies on the use of microRNAs in hepatitis B virus infected patients for the staging of liver fibrosis
Study groupFibrosis staging/validation methodmicroRNA detection method/sample1Data normalizationmicroRNA regulation depending on fibrosis stagingmicroRNA panel for liver fibrosisRef.
102 treatment naïve CHB58 pts F0-F2; 44 pts F3-F4 / liver biopsy and laboratory dataRT-qPCR / serum samplesSpiked-in cel-miR-39F3-F4 vs F0-F2miR-122, -27bmiR-122, -222, PLT, ALPAppourchaux et al[107], 2016
miR-222, -224
330 CHB, 165 HC165 pts F0-F3; 165 pts F4 / clinical and laboratory dataRT-qPCR / serum samplesExogenous control using cel-miR-67CHB: F4 vs F0-F3miR-18a-5p, -21-5p, -29c-3p, -122-5p, -106b-5p, 185-5pThree panels: F4 vs other stages: miR-18a-5p, -21-5p -29c-3p, -122-5p, -106b-5p, 185-5p; F4 vs HC: miR-1, -146a-5p, -451a; CHB vs HC: miR-21-5p, -27a-3p -122-5p, -146a-5pJin et al[139], 2015
CHB F4 vs HCmiR-1, -146a-5p
miR-451a
CHB vs HCmiR-21-5p, -27a-3p, -122-5p, -146a-5p
123 treatment naïve CHB69 pts F0-F2 vs 54 staged F3-F4 / liver biopsyRT-qPCR; Serum samplesSpiked-in cel-miR-39F3-F4 vs F0-F2miR-29a, -143, -223, -21, -374miR-29a, -143, -223, PLTBao et al[43], 2017
8 ASC, 8 AVH, 7 HC, 49 treatment naïve CHB49 CHB patients: 16 pts F0, 19 pts F1-F2, 14 pts F3-F4 / liver biopsy, clinical and laboratory dataRT-qPCR and microarray analysis; Serum samplesU6 RNA control relative miRNA F1-F2miR-499-5pAnalysis of miRNA networks and of individual MiRNA sSingh et al[42], 2018
miR-1227-3p
F3-F4miR-34b-3p, -1224-3p, -1, -10b-5p, -20b-5p, -96b-5p, -133, -455-3p, -671-5p
19 CHB, 14 HC19 CHB pts with F0-F2RT-qPCR total plasma EVs/liver stiffnessSpiked-in cel-miR-39Plasma (F0-F2)miR-192, -200bExpression pattern of each individual miRNA in EVs vs total plasmaLambrecht et al[93], 2017
EVs (F0-F2)miR-192, -200b, -92a, -150
207 CHB, 47 non-HBV-LC, 7 non-CHB, 137 HC207 CHB of which: 127 pts F4; 79 pts F0-F3 / liver biopsyRT-qPCR / plasma samplesmiR-1228 control with a log-2 scale transformationCHB F4 and non-CHB F4; vs other groups; (panel for F4 diagnosis)miR-106bPanel composed of miR-106 and miR-181bChen et al[44], 2013
miR-181b
50 treatment naïve CHB10 pts F0, 10 pts F1, 10 pts F2, 10 pts F3, 10 pts F4 / liver biopsyMicroarray analysis / plasma samplesLog standardization of MiRNA s whose target gene expression levels > 2 folds and FDR < 0.05F4 vs F0miR-2861, -345-3p, -3620-3p, -3656, -371a-5p, -4646-5p, -4651, 4695-5p, -4800-5p, -638,Detailed differential expression of individual MiRNA s for each stage of liver fibrosis F0-F4Zhang et al[137], 2015
miR-497-5p, -486-3p
92 CHB11 pts F0, 16 pts F1, 12 pts F2, 13 pts F3, 40 pts F4 / liver biopsy and laboratory dataRT-qPCR; Plasma samplesQuanto, EC1, EC2 controls; relative miRNA expression was assessed using 2−ΔΔCq calculation≥ F2miR-122-5pmiR-122-5p, -21-5p, -146a-5p, -223, -29c-3p, -22-3p, -381-3pWang et al[106], 2018
miR-223, -29c-3p
≥ F3miR-122-5p
F4 vs F0miR-122-5p, -29c-3p, -146a-5p, -223-/↓