Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2019; 25(11): 1307-1326
Published online Mar 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i11.1307
Table 2 Biomarker panels for diagnosing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease related fibrosis
TestDescriptionAccuracyAdvantagesDisadvantagesGuideline recommendation
APRIAST/platelet ratio indexAUROC 0.70 for SF, 0.75 for AF, and 0.75 for cirrhosis[28]High feasibility; Cheap; ReproducibleLow specificity to diagnose AF; The application of two cut-offs could not discriminate between intermediate stages of fibrosisNA
Fibrosis-4 indexAge, AST, ALT, and platelet countAUROC 0.75 for SF, 0.80 for AF, and 0.85 for cirrhosis[28]High feasibility; Cheap; ReproducibleThe application of two cut-offs could not discriminate between intermediate stages of fibrosis; Influenced by ageFIB-4 can be used to identify those at low or high risk for AF or cirrhosis [32,34]
NFSAge, BMI, impaired fasting glucose and/or diabetes, AST, ALT, platelet, Count, and albuminAUROC 0.72 for SF, 0.73 for AF, and 0.83 for cirrhosis [28]High feasibility; Cheap; ReproducibleThe application of two cut-offs could not discriminate between intermediate stages of fibrosis; Influenced by age; Influenced by interpretation of BMI across different ethnic groupsNFS can be used to identify those at low or high risk for AF or cirrhosis[32]
BARD scoreAST, ALT, BMI, and diabetesAUROC 0.64 for SF, 0.73 for AF, and 0.70 for cirrhosis[28]High feasibility; Cheap; Reproducible; No intermediate stages of fibrosisLow specificity to diagnose SF and cirrhosis; Influenced by interpretation of BMI across different ethnic groupsNA