Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2018; 24(5): 593-601
Published online Feb 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i5.593
Table 1 Relationship between CD68 and Sema4D expression and clinicopathological features of patients n (%)
Clinicopathological featureCD68-positive
Sema4D-positive
Positive rateχ2P valuePositive rateχ2P value
Age (yr)0.7610.3833.5380.060
≤ 50103/149 (69.0)104/149 (70.0)
> 50104/141 (73.8)112/141 (79.4)
Gender0.5240.4692.1940.139
Male105/151 (69.5)113/151 (77.2)
Female102/139 (73.4)114/139 (71.2)
Histological differentiation type18.5110.00030.69610.0001
Well differentiated adenocarcinoma41/78 (52.5)40/78 (51.3)
Moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma88/113 (87.9)96/113 (85.0)
Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma78/99 (78.8)80/99 (80.8)
Tumor diameter (cm)3.1200.0771.1890.276
< 5116/153 (75.8)118/153 (77.1)
≥ 591/137 (66.4)98/137 (71.5)
TNM stage6.1420.01320.6390.000
I/II58/105 (55.2)60/105 (57.1)
III/IV149/185 (80.5)1.000156/185 (84.3)
Lymph node metastasis7.3750.0076.3190.012
Yes149/195 (76.4)154/195 (80.0)
No58/95 (61.1)62/95 (65.3)