Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2018; 24(33): 3776-3785
Published online Sep 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i33.3776
Table 3 Clinicopathologic characteristics according to surgical strategy
CharacteristicsEarly salvage ESD (n = 6, %)Late salvage ESD (n = 8, %)Late secondary ESD (n = 14, %)P value
Gender0. 909
Male4 (66.7)5 (62.5)10 (71.4)
Female2 (33.3)3 (37.5)4 (28.6)
Age [yr, mean (SD)]65.4 (10.8)61.6 (7.3)63.8 (9.9)0.749
Lesion location0.255
Upper2 (33.3)0 (0.0)1 (7.1)
Middle2 (33.3)4 (50.0)9 (64.3)
Lower2 (33.3)4 (50.0)4 (28.6)
Multiplicity0 (0.0)1 (12.5)1 (7.1)0.668
Lesion size [mm, mean (SD)]19.8 (22.4)13.6 (10.9)16.4 (9.8)0.701
Initial method0.341
EMR0 (0.0)0 (0.0)2 (14.3)
ESD6 (100.0)8 (100.0)12 (85.7)
Macroscopic type0.014
Elevated0 (0.0)0 (0.0)7 (50.0)
Flat4 (66.7)2 (25.0)3 (21.4)
Depressed2 (33.3)6 (75.0)4 (28.6)
WHO classification0.081
Low grade dysplasia2 (33.3)3 (37.5)3 (21.4)
High grade dysplasia0 (0.0)1 (12.5)3 (21.4)
Well differentiated1 (16.7)0 (0.0)3 (21.4)
Moderately differentiated1 (16.7)4 (50.0)2 (14.3)
Poorly differentiated0 (0.0)0 (0.0)3 (21.4)
Signet ring cell carcinoma0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
No residual lesion2 (33.3)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Depth of invasion0.090
Dysplasia2 (33.3)4 (50.0)6 (42.9)
Mucosal cancer2 (33.3)4 (50.0)8 (57.1)
Submucosal cancer0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
No residual lesion2 (33.3)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
LVI1.000
No6 (100.0)8 (100.0)14 (100.0)
Yes0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Lateral margin0.341
Negative6 (100.0)8 (100.0)12 (85.7)
Positive0 (0.0)0 (0.0)2 (14.3)
Vertical margin0.617
Negative6 (100.0)8 (100.0)13 (92.9)
Positive0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (7.1)