BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2018; 24(33): 3776-3785
Published online Sep 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i33.3776
Table 2 Comparison of procedural outcomes and oncologic outcomes between the primary endoscopic submucosal dissection group and secondary endoscopic submucosal dissection group
ESD
Secondary ESD
P value
(n = 1595, %)(n = 28, %)
Lesion size [mm, mean (SD)]17.4 (12.8)16.4 (13.2)0.664
Specimen size [mm, mean (SD)]38.1 (14.6)47.8 (19.6)0.001
Whole procedure time [min, mean (SD)]55.1 (41.5)78.2 (38.0)0.004
Dissection time [min, mean (SD)]36.7 (34.7)63.4 (38.0)< 0.001
Dissection speed [mm2/min, mean (SD)]38.7 (32.8)22.1 (12.7)< 0.001
Complication61 (3.8)3 (10.7)0.095
Perforation37 (2.3)0 (0.0)
Bleeding15 (0.9)1 (3.6)
Aspiration pneumonia13 (0.8)2 (7.1)
Hospital stay [d, mean (SD)]3.6 (3.2)3.9 (2.5)0.639
En bloc resection1574 (98.7)26 (92.9)0.058
Curative resection1383 (86.7)25 (89.3)1.000
Additive salvage treatment104 (6.5)3 (10.7)0.425
Additive surgery85 (5.3)2 (7.1)
Redo ESD16 (1.0)1 (3.6)
Argon plasma coagulation3 (0.2)0 (0.0)


Write to the Help Desk