Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2018; 24(33): 3776-3785
Published online Sep 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i33.3776
Table 1 Baseline characteristics
CharacteristicsESD
Secondary ESD
P value
(n = 1595, %)(n = 28, %)
Gender0. 836
Male1117 (70.0)19 (67.9)
Female478 (30.0)9 (32.1)
Age [yr, mean (SD)]64.8 (10.4)63.5 (9.2)0.528
Lesion location0.217
Upper127 (8.0)3 (11.1)
Middle633 (39.7)15 (53.6)
Lower835 (52.4)10 (35.7)
Multiplicity250 (15.7)2 (7.1)0.296
Lesion size [mm, mean (SD)]17.4 (12.8)16.4 (13.2)0.664
Macroscopic type< 0.001
Elevated674 (42.3)7 (25.0)
Flat685 (42.9)9 (32.1)
Depressed236 (14.8)12 (42.9)
WHO classification< 0.001
Low grade dysplasia610 (38.2)8 (28.6)
High grade dysplasia221 (13.9)4 (14.3)
Well differentiated356 (22.3)4 (14.3)
Moderately differentiated268 (16.8)7 (25.0)
Poorly differentiated76 (4.8)3 (10.7)
Signet ring cell carcinoma64 (4.0)0 (0.0)
No residual lesion0 (0.0)2 (7.1)
Depth of invasion< 0.001
Dysplasia831 (52.1)12 (42.9)
Mucosal cancer609 (38.2)14 (50.0)
Submucosal cancer155 (9.7)0 (0.0)
No residual lesion0 (0.0)2 (7.1)
LVI1.000
No1546 (96.9)28 (100.0)
Yes49 (3.1)0 (0.0)
Lateral margin0.381
Negative1521 (95.4)26 (92.9)
Positive74 (4.6)2 (7.1)
Vertical margin0.615
Negative1542 (96.7)27 (96.4)
Positive53 (3.3)1 (3.6)