Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2017; 23(9): 1657-1665
Published online Mar 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1657
Published online Mar 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1657
FlushKnife-BT (n = 6) | FlushKnife-BTS (n = 7) | P vaule1 | |
Use of the thread-traction method, yes/no | 3/3 | 2/5 | 0.592 |
Procedure time, median (range), min | 48 (24-106) | 33 (27-51) | 0.389 |
Treatment speed, median (range), mm2/min | 25.5 (19.6-30.3) | 44.2 (15.5-55.4) | 0.0633 |
Number of times the knife was replaced, median (range), times | 5.5 (4-10) | 1 (0-3) | 0.0025 |
Frequency of knife replacement, median (range), times/hour | 7.02 (4.23-15) | 1.76 (0-5.45) | 0.0065 |
En bloc resection rate | 6/6 (100%) | 7/7 (100%) | 0.000 |
Adverse events, Perforation/muscle injury/postoperative bleeding | 0/1/0 | 0/0/0 | 0.462 |
- Citation: Ohara Y, Toyonaga T, Hoshi N, Tanaka S, Baba S, Takihara H, Kawara F, Ishida T, Morita Y, Umegaki E, Azuma T. Usefulness of a novel slim type FlushKnife-BT over conventional FlushKnife-BT in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(9): 1657-1665
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i9/1657.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1657