Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2017; 23(35): 6385-6402
Published online Sep 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i35.6385
Table 1 Expected time to clinical response for therapeutic agents used in the management of inflammatory bowel disease
AgentEarliest published clinical responseEarliest published objective responseTime to response in most patients1Time to futilityUse of therapeutic drug monitoringComments
Mesalazine (oral)1 wk[21]3 wk[148]4 wk> 12 wkNA higher dose may lead to a more rapid response
Prednisolone (oral)2 wk[28]2 wk[28]3 to 7 wk8 wkNMay take longer for CD
Corticosteroids (IV)3 d[31]1 wk[127]3-5 d7-10 dN
Infliximab (IV)1 wk[48]8 wk[149]2-8 wk> 6 moY
Adalimumab (SC)4 wk[59]8 wk[59]4-8 wk> 6 moYResponse time better with 160/80 mg vs 40/40 mg induction dosing
Certolizumab (SC)2wk[61]10 wk[64]10 wk> 16 wkN
Golimumab (SC)6 wk[65]6 wk[65]6 wk> 14 wkY
Certolizumab (SC)2 wk[61]10 wk[64]10 wk> 16 wkN
Vedolizumab (IV)6 wk[78]6 wk[78]19 wk12 moN2Response time may be better for UC vs CD
Thiopurines (oral)2 wk[80]3 mo[88]> 6-9 moYEndoscopic response may take much longer than clinical response
10 to 12 wk
Methotrexate (oral or SC)9 wk[111]12 wk[110]9 wk> 6 moNResponse time and efficacy may be better in 1) CD vs UC, 2) SC vs oral
Cyclosporin (IV then oral)1 wk[127]1 wk[127]4 to 5 d> 14 dY
Tacrolimus (oral)2 wk[122]2 wk[122]2 wk4 wkY
EEN (oral)10 d[131]4 wk[139]3 to 4 wk8 wkN