Randomized Clinical Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2017; 23(2): 328-335
Published online Jan 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.328
Table 3 Outcomes and adverse events among the patients
CSP group (95%CI)HFB group (95%CI)P value
Endoscopic evaluation147/148 = 99.3%108/135 = 80.0%< 0.0001
En-bloc resection rate with free cut-margin(92.3%-100.0%)(72.3%-86.4%)
Pathologic evaluation119/148 = 80.4%64/135 = 47.4%< 0.0001
Complete resection rate with free cut-margin(73.1%-86.5%)(38.8%-56.2%)
Histological tissue injury2/148 = 1.3%71/135 = 52.6%< 0.0001
(0.2%-4.8%)(43.8%-61.2%)
Adverse event
Immediate bleeding13/148 = 8.8%11/135 = 8.1%1.00
(4.8%-14.6%)(4.1%-14.1%)
Delayed bleeding00
Perforation00

  • Citation: Komeda Y, Kashida H, Sakurai T, Tribonias G, Okamoto K, Kono M, Yamada M, Adachi T, Mine H, Nagai T, Asakuma Y, Hagiwara S, Matsui S, Watanabe T, Kitano M, Chikugo T, Chiba Y, Kudo M. Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(2): 328-335
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i2/328.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.328