Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2016; 22(44): 9661-9673
Published online Nov 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i44.9661
Table 3 Summary of studies concerning cryosurgery
AuthorsNumber of patientsLesionLocationTreatment typeApproachNeedleMean treatment durationConclusion
Xu et al[9]49Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma-Cryosurgery36 percutaneous with US or CT + 13 intraoperative2 or 3 mm-Cryosurgery is associated with a low rate of adverse effects
Li et al[54]2Neuroendocrine tumorsHead and tailCryosurgeryPercutaneous with US and CT1.7 mm and 2 mm10 and 15 minPercutaneous cryosurgery is minimally invasive and
has advantages compared with conventional surgery
Niu et al[55]67Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma-CryosurgeryPercutaneous with US and CT1.7 mm-Cryoimmunotherapy significantly increased overall survival in metastatic
pancreatic cancer