Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2016; 22(39): 8790-8797
Published online Oct 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8790
Table 4 Comparisons between the slow-pull technique and conventional suction techniques in terms of cytological diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and blood contamination
5-mL
10-mL
20-mL
vs slow-pull, P value1
Accuracy0.0320.00520.0102
Sensitivity0.01420.00620.0102
Blood contamination score ≥ 20.1350.00120.0072