Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2016; 22(37): 8257-8270
Published online Oct 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i37.8257
Table 1 Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided radiofrequency ablation on pancreatic tumours
Ref.nIndicationMean size mm (range)RF deviceThermokineticsRF sessionsOutcomeSurvival (range)Complications
Armellini et al[31], 20051PNET2018 G Needle electrodeNANAComplete ablation-No complication
(STARmed)
Arcidiacono et al[32], 201222Locally advanced PC36CTP18 W (heating)NASignificant volume reduction in 16 patients6 mo1Early:
(23-54)650 psi (cooling)(P = 0.07)(1-12)3 transient abdominal pain
107 (10-360) sTechnical failure in 6 patients1 minor duodenal bleeding
Late:
2 jaundice
1 duodenal stricture
1 cystic fluid collection
Rossi et al[33], 20141PNET9Habib EUS RFA10-15 W1Complete thermal ablation-No complication
360 sNo recurrence
(34 mo follow-up)
Weigt et al[34], 20141IPMN10Habib EndoHBP8 WNA2 cm ablation-Mild acute pancreatitis
(recurrent bleeding)90 sNo rebleeding
(10 wk follow-up)
Pai et al[27], 20158Mucinous cyst (4)41 (24-70)Habib EUS RFA5-25 W4.5-2 mild abdominal pain
IPMN (1)3590-120 s(2-7)2 cyst resolution
Microcystic adenoma (1)204 cyst reduction
PNET (2)27 (15-40)(48 % reduction)
2 PNET with vascularity change
Lakhtakia et al[25], 20153Insulinoma1818 G Needle electrode50 WNANo recurrent hypoglycemia-No complication
(Hypoglycemia)(14-22)(STARmed)10-15 s(12 mo follow-up)
Song et al[28], 20166Locally advanced PC (4)3818 G20-50 W1.3Necrosis at the ablation siteNA2 mild abdominal pain
Metastatic PC (2)(30-90)Needle electrode10 s(1-2)
(STARmed)