Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2016; 22(28): 6539-6546
Published online Jul 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i28.6539
Table 1 Comparing the characteristics of patients underwent standard scope vs high definition scope with narrow band imaging n (%)
ParametersStandard scope (1) (n = 68)HD scope (n = 72)P value
Female41 (60)48 (67)0.40
Age (yr), median (IQR)56 (52-61)57 (53-64)0.70
Education0.40
High school and lower31 (46)38 (54)
> High school37 (54)34 (47)
H/o previous colonoscopy25 (37)19 (26)0.20
H/o previous colon polyp6 (9)7 (10)0.80
Family h/o colon cancer22 (22)12 (17)0.40
Indication0.20
Screening34 (50)45 (63)
Diagnostic18 (26)19 (26)
Follow up16 (24)8 (11)
Colon preparation0.08
Good63 (93)71 (99)
Moderate5 (7)1 (1)
Number of patient with polyp diagnosis41 (60)49 (68)0.30
Total number of polyps detected, median (IQR)1 (1-2)12 (1-3)20.20
Adenoma detection rate23 (34)32 (44)0.20
Advanced adenoma detection rate7 (10)8 (11)0.90
Hyperplastic polyp detection rate19 (28)21 (29)0.90
Proportion of patients with multiple polyps17 (41)128 (57)20.10